Literature DB >> 18711126

Receptor density balances signal stimulation and attenuation in membrane-assembled complexes of bacterial chemotaxis signaling proteins.

Tatiana Y Besschetnova1, David J Montefusco, Abdalin E Asinas, Anthony L Shrout, Frances M Antommattei, Robert M Weis.   

Abstract

All cells possess transmembrane signaling systems that function in the environment of the lipid bilayer. In the Escherichia coli chemotaxis pathway, the binding of attractants to a two-dimensional array of receptors and signaling proteins simultaneously inhibits an associated kinase and stimulates receptor methylation--a slower process that restores kinase activity. These two opposing effects lead to robust adaptation toward stimuli through a physical mechanism that is not understood. Here, we provide evidence of a counterbalancing influence exerted by receptor density on kinase stimulation and receptor methylation. Receptor signaling complexes were reconstituted over a range of defined surface concentrations by using a template-directed assembly method, and the kinase and receptor methylation activities were measured. Kinase activity and methylation rates were both found to vary significantly with surface concentration--yet in opposite ways: samples prepared at high surface densities stimulated kinase activity more effectively than low-density samples, whereas lower surface densities produced greater methylation rates than higher densities. FRET experiments demonstrated that the cooperative change in kinase activity coincided with a change in the arrangement of the membrane-associated receptor domains. The counterbalancing influence of density on receptor methylation and kinase stimulation leads naturally to a model for signal regulation that is compatible with the known logic of the E. coli pathway. Density-dependent mechanisms are likely to be general and may operate when two or more membrane-related processes are influenced differently by the two-dimensional concentration of pathway elements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18711126      PMCID: PMC2527904          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0802868105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  46 in total

1.  Four-helical-bundle structure of the cytoplasmic domain of a serine chemotaxis receptor.

Authors:  K K Kim; H Yokota; S H Kim
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-08-19       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Conformational changes in the cytoplasmic domain of the Escherichia coli aspartate receptor upon adaptive methylation.

Authors:  H Le Moual; T Quang; D E Koshland
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1998-10-20       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Molecular evolution of the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain of a superfamily of bacterial receptors involved in taxis.

Authors:  H Le Moual; D E Koshland
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-08-30       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  The serine chemoreceptor from Escherichia coli is methylated through an inter-dimer process.

Authors:  J Li; G Li; R M Weis
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1997-09-30       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Interaction between proteins localized in membranes.

Authors:  B Grasberger; A P Minton; C DeLisi; H Metzger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Evidence that both ligand binding and covalent adaptation drive a two-state equilibrium in the aspartate receptor signaling complex.

Authors:  J A Bornhorst; J J Falke
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.086

7.  Polar location of the chemoreceptor complex in the Escherichia coli cell.

Authors:  J R Maddock; L Shapiro
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-03-19       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The receptor binding site for the methyltransferase of bacterial chemotaxis is distinct from the sites of methylation.

Authors:  J Wu; J Li; G Li; D G Long; R M Weis
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1996-04-16       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Attenuation of sensory receptor signaling by covalent modification.

Authors:  K A Borkovich; L A Alex; M I Simon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Ligand-specific activation of Escherichia coli chemoreceptor transmethylation.

Authors:  Frances M Antommattei; Jennifer B Munzner; Robert M Weis
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  21 in total

1.  A dynamic-signaling-team model for chemotaxis receptors in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Clinton H Hansen; Victor Sourjik; Ned S Wingreen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Spatial organization in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Victor Sourjik; Judith P Armitage
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Attractant binding induces distinct structural changes to the polar and lateral signaling clusters in Bacillus subtilis chemotaxis.

Authors:  Kang Wu; Hanna E Walukiewicz; George D Glekas; George W Ordal; Christopher V Rao
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Structure of the ternary complex formed by a chemotaxis receptor signaling domain, the CheA histidine kinase, and the coupling protein CheW as determined by pulsed dipolar ESR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Jaya Bhatnagar; Peter P Borbat; Abiola M Pollard; Alexandrine M Bilwes; Jack H Freed; Brian R Crane
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  The chemoreceptor dimer is the unit of conformational coupling and transmembrane signaling.

Authors:  Divya N Amin; Gerald L Hazelbauer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Disruption of chemoreceptor signalling arrays by high levels of CheW, the receptor-kinase coupling protein.

Authors:  Marcos J Cardozo; Diego A Massazza; John S Parkinson; Claudia A Studdert
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.501

7.  Quantification of the brassinosteroid insensitive1 receptor in planta.

Authors:  G Wilma van Esse; Adrie H Westphal; Ramya Preethi Surendran; Catherine Albrecht; Boudewijn van Veen; Jan Willem Borst; Sacco C de Vries
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Single-molecule atomic force microscopy reveals clustering of the yeast plasma-membrane sensor Wsc1.

Authors:  Jürgen J Heinisch; Vincent Dupres; Sabrina Wilk; Arne Jendretzki; Yves F Dufrêne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Sending signals dynamically.

Authors:  Robert G Smock; Lila M Gierasch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Self-organization of the Escherichia coli chemotaxis network imaged with super-resolution light microscopy.

Authors:  Derek Greenfield; Ann L McEvoy; Hari Shroff; Gavin E Crooks; Ned S Wingreen; Eric Betzig; Jan Liphardt
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.