Literature DB >> 18709382

Results of macular pucker surgery: 1- and 5-year follow-up.

M Dimitri Bouwens1, Floris de Jong, Paul Mulder, Jan C van Meurs.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although macular pucker removal in patients with metamorphopsia due to a macular pucker is a traditional elective vitreoretinal indication, we found that patients were not uniformly satisfied after surgery. We wished to study outcome in vision and metamorphopsia in patients undergoing macular pucker surgery, to assess changes between 1- and 5-year follow-up, as well as patient satisfaction at 5 years.
METHODS: We assessed 107 consecutive patients undergoing macular pucker surgery and subsequent cataract surgery when not already pseudophakic. Early Treatment of Diabetes Study (EDTRS) vision and Sine Amsler Chart metamorphopsia grading were assessed before surgery and 1 year postop in 107 patients. In 57 patients we obtained a 5-year vision, metamorphopsia grading and a response to a questionnaire.
RESULTS: After 1 year, mean vision had improved 2 ETDRS lines and metamorphopsia had decreased in 83% of the patients. The 57 patients returning for the 5-year follow-up and questionnaire had a statistically significantly greater improvement in vision at 1 year than those who did not return. In these 57 patients, a further mean increase of 1 ETDRS line had occurred, as well as a further decrease in metamorphopsia in one third of the patients. Forty of 57 patients (70%) indicated that they would elect to have surgery again. Reasons for not returning after 5 years, however, were probably related to dissatisfaction in at least one third of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Although macular pucker surgery resulted in an increase in vision and a decrease of metamorphopsia in 83% of patients after 1 year, we assume, based on the biased patient sample we questioned after 5 years, that subjective assessment would be positive in only a small majority of the patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18709382     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-008-0909-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  22 in total

1.  Endoillumination during vitrectomy and phototoxicity thresholds.

Authors:  P R van den Biesen; T Berenschot; R M Verdaasdonk; H van Weelden; D van Norren
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Quantification of metamorphopsia in patients with epiretinal membranes.

Authors:  Chota Matsumoto; Eiko Arimura; Sachiko Okuyama; Sonoko Takada; Shigeki Hashimoto; Yoshikazu Shimomura
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Quantification of metamorphopsia in patients with epiretinal membranes before and after surgery.

Authors:  Carl Arndt; Olivier Rebollo; Sylvie Séguinet; Philippe Debruyne; Georges Caputo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Visual quality of life after macular hole surgery: outcome and predictive factors.

Authors:  Christoph Hirneiss; Aljoscha S Neubauer; Carolin A Gass; Ingrid W Reiniger; Siegfried G Priglinger; Anselm Kampik; Christos Haritoglou
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Prognostic value of pattern reversal visual-evoked potentials in idiopathic epiretinal membrane.

Authors:  M A Tilanus; M H Cuypers; N A Bemelmans; A J Pinckers
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Visual outcome of surgery for epiretinal membranes with macular pseudoholes.

Authors:  P Massin; M Paques; H Masri; B Haouchine; A Erginay; P Blain; A Gaudric
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Sine Amsler Charts: a new method for the follow-up of metamorphopsia in patients undergoing macular pucker surgery.

Authors:  M Dimitri Bouwens; Jan C Van Meurs
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-01-29       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  [Visual quality of life after vitreoretinal surgery for epiretinal membranes].

Authors:  C Hirneiss; F Rombold; A Kampik; A S Neubauer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  Entry-site-related retinal detachment after pars plana vitrectomy.

Authors:  Barbara Wimpissinger; Susanne Binder
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2007-04-24

10.  Vitrectomy for macular pucker.

Authors:  R G Michels
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  8 in total

1.  Two-year results of metamorphopsia, visual acuity, and optical coherence tomographic parameters after epiretinal membrane surgery.

Authors:  Takamasa Kinoshita; Hiroko Imaizumi; Hirotomo Miyamoto; Takashi Katome; Kentaro Semba; Yoshinori Mitamura
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  [Macular pucker surgery with and without delamination of the internal limiting membrane-a prospective randomized study].

Authors:  M W Storch; M H Khattab; P Lauermann; C Krüger; U Ritzau-Tondrow; R Staudenmaier; J Callizo; H Hoerauf
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Assessment of retinal layers and visual rehabilitation after epiretinal membrane removal.

Authors:  Jae Hui Kim; Se Woong Kang; Min Gui Kong; Hyo Shin Ha
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  [Watchful waiting as a therapeutic principle for diseases of the vitreoretinal interface].

Authors:  H Hoerauf; B Kirchhof
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Changes in metamorphopsia in daily life after successful epiretinal membrane surgery and correlation with M-CHARTS score.

Authors:  Takamasa Kinoshita; Hiroko Imaizumi; Hirotomo Miyamoto; Utako Okushiba; Yuki Hayashi; Takashi Katome; Yoshinori Mitamura
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-04

6.  Prevalence and risk factors of idiopathic epiretinal membranes in Beixinjing blocks, Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Xiao-feng Zhu; Jin-juan Peng; Hai-dong Zou; Jiong Fu; Wei-wei Wang; Xun Xu; Xi Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Long-Term Outcomes After Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane Surgery.

Authors:  Abdelrahman M Elhusseiny; Harry W Flynn; William E Smiddy
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-31

8.  Prevalence and Risk Factors of Epiretinal Membranes in a Chinese Population: The Kailuan Eye Study.

Authors:  Xiao Bo Zhu; Mo Chi Yang; Ya Xing Wang; Wang Qian; Yan Ni Yan; Jing Yan Yang; Shou Ling Wu; Shuo Hua Chen; Li Dong; Wen Bin Wei; Jost B Jonas
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.799

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.