Literature DB >> 12605261

Sine Amsler Charts: a new method for the follow-up of metamorphopsia in patients undergoing macular pucker surgery.

M Dimitri Bouwens1, Jan C Van Meurs.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate our new method for the follow-up of metamorphopsia in patients with a macular pucker.
METHODS: Sine Amsler Charts (SAC) are a set of eight modified Amsler charts where we have replaced the straight lines by sine curves of the same frequency but with different amplitudes (grades I-VIII). The patient first examines a regular Amsler chart with the affected eye; subsequently the SAC are presented in random order to the fellow eye. With this eye the patient then selects the SAC with the amplitude that best corresponds to the metamorphopsia observed with the affected eye. After 30 min the test was repeated. A comparison of pre- and postoperative SAC scores was made in 63 patients. The correlations between preoperative visual acuity, membrane type, leakage on fluorescein angiography, preoperative SAC score, postoperative SAC score and postoperative visual acuity were analyzed.
RESULTS: Preoperative repeat testing with the SAC revealed 100% reproducibility in the grading of metamorphopsia. Postoperative SAC was unchanged in 16% of cases, one grade lower in 54%, two grades lower in 21% and more than two grades lower in 7%. Postoperative visual acuity was unchanged (i.e., within two EDTRS lines of the preoperative value) in 49% of cases, improved in 48% and decreased in 3%. A decrease in SAC score with a two-line increase in visual acuity occurred in 43% of cases.
CONCLUSION: The SAC examination is a reproducible and rapid method for the comparison of the preoperative and postoperative metamorphopsia in patients undergoing pucker surgery and it may serve as an additional outcome measure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12605261     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-002-0613-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  10 in total

1.  A new method for quantification of metamorphopsia in patients with epiretinal membrane.

Authors:  K Shinoda; S Ishida; S Kawashima; T Matsuzaki; K Yamada; H Katsura
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Idiopathic preretinal fibrosis: a review of 237 cases.

Authors:  A R Pilkerton; W S Gilbert; L E Perraut; L E Perraut; R A Garfinkel
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg       Date:  1992-02

3.  Prognostic factors in vitrectomy for epiretinal membranes of the macula.

Authors:  T A Rice; S De Bustros; R G Michels; J T Thompson; S M Debanne; D Y Rowland
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Preoperative fluorescein angiographic features of surgically removed idiopathic epiretinal membranes.

Authors:  A M Maguire; R R Margherio; C Dmuchowski
Journal:  Retina       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Removal of epimacular membranes.

Authors:  R R Margherio; M S Cox; M T Trese; P L Murphy; J Johnson; L A Minor
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Effect of infusion air pressure on visual field defects after macular hole surgery.

Authors:  A Hirata; N Yonemura; T Hasumura; Y Murata; A Negi
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Surgical management of idiopathic epiretinal membranes.

Authors:  H R McDonald; W P Verre; T M Aaberg
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  [Surgical treatment of epiretinal macular fibrosis: the Lausanne experience].

Authors:  B Piguet; M Gonvers
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 0.700

9.  Vitrectomy for premacular fibroplasia. Prognostic factors, long-term follow-up, and time course of visual improvement.

Authors:  S R Pesin; R J Olk; M G Grand; I Boniuk; N P Arribas; M A Thomas; D F Williams; D Burgess
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Vitrectomy for macular pucker.

Authors:  R G Michels
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 12.079

  10 in total
  16 in total

1.  Quantification of metamorphopsia in patients with epiretinal membranes before and after surgery.

Authors:  Carl Arndt; Olivier Rebollo; Sylvie Séguinet; Philippe Debruyne; Georges Caputo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  [Diagnostics of metamorphopsia in retinal diseases of different origins].

Authors:  C Klatt; P Sendtner; L Ponomareva; J Hillenkamp; A Bunse; V-P Gabel; J Roider
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Potential role of Müller cells in the pathogenesis of macropsia associated with epiretinal membrane: a hypothesis revisited.

Authors:  Ahmet Colakoglu; Solmaz Balci Akar
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Assessment of retinal layers and visual rehabilitation after epiretinal membrane removal.

Authors:  Jae Hui Kim; Se Woong Kang; Min Gui Kong; Hyo Shin Ha
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Preoperative aniseikonia is a prognostic factor for postoperative stereopsis in patients with unilateral epiretinal membrane.

Authors:  Fumiki Okamoto; Shohei Morikawa; Yoshimi Sugiura; Sujin Hoshi; Takahiro Hiraoka; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  (In) sensitivity to spatial distortion in natural scenes.

Authors:  Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Results of macular pucker surgery: 1- and 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  M Dimitri Bouwens; Floris de Jong; Paul Mulder; Jan C van Meurs
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  Idiopathic epiretinal membrane: progression and timing of surgery.

Authors:  Paul Y Chua; Maria T Sandinha; David H Steel
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.456

9.  Postoperative metamorphopsia in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: associations with visual function, vision related quality of life, and optical coherence tomography findings.

Authors:  Mathijs A J van de Put; Jelle Vehof; Johanna M M Hooymans; Leonoor I Los
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Assessment of metamorphopsia in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy.

Authors:  Sin Woo Bae; Ju Byung Chae
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.