Literature DB >> 18706934

Effects of food deprivation on goal-directed behavior, spontaneous locomotion, and c-Fos immunoreactivity in the amygdala.

J M Moscarello1, O Ben-Shahar, A Ettenberg.   

Abstract

Previous work in our laboratory has shown that food deprivation and food presentation produce different patterns of neuronal activity (as measured by c-Fos immunoreactivity) in the medial prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens of rats. Since the amygdala has been implicated in both motivational and reinforcement processes and has neuronal connections to both the prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens, it was of interest to assess amygdaloid c-Fos immunoreactivity during similar manipulations of food deprivation and presentation. In the current study, c-Fos counts in both basolateral and central amygdalar nuclei were observed to increase in rats 12- and 36-h food deprived (relative to 0-h controls)-an effect reversed by the presentation of either a small or large meal (2.5 or 20g of food). In another experiment, rats working on a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement exhibited elevated break-points as a function of food deprivation, a result consistent with the view that the feeding manipulations increased the subjects' level of motivation. In contrast, food deprivation reduced the spontaneous locomotor activity of rats, presumably as a result of an inherent energy-conservation strategy when no food is readily available. These data suggest that the state of food deprivation is associated with: (a) enhanced behavioral output only when food is attainable (increased goal-directed behavior, but decreased spontaneous activity), and (b) increased synaptic engagement in neuronal circuits involved in affective valuation and related decision-making (increased c-Fos counts in the amygdala).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18706934      PMCID: PMC2677302          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.07.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  41 in total

1.  Behavioral and neural predictors of upcoming decisions.

Authors:  M X Cohen; C Ranganath
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 2.  Effort-related functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine and associated forebrain circuits.

Authors:  J D Salamone; M Correa; A Farrar; S M Mingote
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Amygdala-prefrontal cortical circuitry regulates effort-based decision making.

Authors:  Stan B Floresco; Sarvin Ghods-Sharifi
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 4.  Stimulus-transcription coupling in the nervous system: involvement of the inducible proto-oncogenes fos and jun.

Authors:  J I Morgan; T Curran
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 5.  Progressive ratio schedules in drug self-administration studies in rats: a method to evaluate reinforcing efficacy.

Authors:  N R Richardson; D C Roberts
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Characteristics of basolateral amygdala neuronal firing on a spatial memory task involving differential reward.

Authors:  W E Pratt; S J Mizumori
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  A unfied interpretation of emotion and motivation.

Authors:  D Bindra
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1969-07-30       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Orbitofrontal cortex and basolateral amygdala encode expected outcomes during learning.

Authors:  G Schoenbaum; A A Chiba; M Gallagher
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 9.  Amygdalar control of the mesocorticolimbic dopamine system: parallel pathways to motivated behavior.

Authors:  Anthony G Phillips; Soyon Ahn; John G Howland
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Fear and the human amygdala.

Authors:  R Adolphs; D Tranel; H Damasio; A R Damasio
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  17 in total

1.  A sipometer for measuring motivation to consume and reward value of foods and beverages in humans: Description and proof of principle.

Authors:  P S Hogenkamp; A Shechter; M-P St-Onge; A Sclafani; H R Kissileff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-01-13

2.  Motivational states influence effort-based decision making in rats: the role of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  Bettina Mai; Susanne Sommer; Wolfgang Hauber
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Rethinking the emotional brain.

Authors:  Joseph LeDoux
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Central amygdala opioid transmission is necessary for increased high-fat intake following 24-h food deprivation, but not following intra-accumbens opioid administration.

Authors:  Kyle E Parker; Howard W Johns; Ted G Floros; Matthew J Will
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-17       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Moderate prenatal alcohol exposure impairs performance by adult male rats in an object-place paired-associate task.

Authors:  Lilliana M Sanchez; Jonathan Goss; Jennifer Wagner; Suzy Davies; Daniel D Savage; Derek A Hamilton; Benjamin J Clark
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Anxiety is correlated with running in adolescent female mice undergoing activity-based anorexia.

Authors:  Gauri S Wable; Jung-Yun Min; Yi-Wen Chen; Chiye Aoki
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  External incentives and internal states guide goal-directed behavior via the differential recruitment of the nucleus accumbens and the medial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  J M Moscarello; O Ben-Shahar; A Ettenberg
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Prior extended daily access to cocaine elevates the reward threshold in a conditioned place preference test.

Authors:  Zu-In Su; Jennifer Wenzel; Aaron Ettenberg; Osnat Ben-Shahar
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.280

9.  Fos expression in the orbital prefrontal cortex after exposure to the fixed-interval peak procedure.

Authors:  L Valencia-Torres; C M Olarte-Sánchez; S Body; K C F Fone; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Fos expression in the prefrontal cortex and ventral striatum after exposure to a free-operant timing schedule.

Authors:  L Valencia-Torres; C M Olarte-Sánchez; S Body; T H C Cheung; K C F Fone; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.