Literature DB >> 18706285

Revascularization treatment recommendations based on atherosclerotic disease distribution: coronary artery bypass grafting versus stenting.

Kim I de la Cruz1, Peter I Tsai, William E Cohn, Denton A Cooley.   

Abstract

In patients with coronary artery disease, the need for more accurately defined treatment recommendations based on the distribution of atherosclerotic disease has given rise to multiple trials designed to evaluate the efficacy of medical therapy versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). To clarify these treatment recommendations, we reviewed relevant trials. Patients with chronic stable angina who have one-vessel or two-vessel coronary artery disease without involvement of the left main or left anterior descending coronary arteries fare similarly regardless of treatment modality. In contrast, patients with multivessel disease and inducible ischemia are better served by revascularization by either CABG or PCI. In patients who have left main involvement, diffuse disease with severe atherosclerosis, diabetes mellitus, advanced age, or left ventricular dysfunction, the outcome with regard to survival, anginal relief, and freedom from additional intervention is better with CABG than with PCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18706285     DOI: 10.1007/s11883-008-0066-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep        ISSN: 1523-3804            Impact factor:   5.113


  19 in total

1.  ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery).

Authors:  Kim A Eagle; Robert A Guyton; Ravin Davidoff; Fred H Edwards; Gordon A Ewy; Timothy J Gardner; James C Hart; Howard C Herrmann; L David Hillis; Adolph M Hutter; Bruce Whitney Lytle; Robert A Marlow; William C Nugent; Thomas A Orszulak
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass grafting versus stent implantation.

Authors:  Edward L Hannan; Michael J Racz; Gary Walford; Robert H Jones; Thomas J Ryan; Edward Bennett; Alfred T Culliford; O Wayne Isom; Jeffrey P Gold; Eric A Rose
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Five-year follow-up of the Argentine randomized trial of coronary angioplasty with stenting versus coronary bypass surgery in patients with multiple vessel disease (ERACI II).

Authors:  Alfredo E Rodriguez; Julio Baldi; Carlos Fernández Pereira; Jose Navia; Máximo Rodriguez Alemparte; Alejandro Delacasa; Federico Vigo; Daniel Vogel; William O'Neill; Igor F Palacios
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Five-year outcomes after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease: the final analysis of the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study (ARTS) randomized trial.

Authors:  Patrick W Serruys; Andrew T L Ong; Lex A van Herwerden; J Eduardo Sousa; Adib Jatene; Johannes J R M Bonnier; Jacques P M A Schönberger; Nigel Buller; Robert Bonser; Clemens Disco; Bianca Backx; Paul G Hugenholtz; Brian G Firth; Felix Unger
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Argentine Randomized Study: Coronary Angioplasty with Stenting versus Coronary Bypass Surgery in patients with Multiple-Vessel Disease (ERACI II): 30-day and one-year follow-up results. ERACI II Investigators.

Authors:  A Rodriguez; V Bernardi; J Navia; J Baldi; L Grinfeld; J Martinez; D Vogel; R Grinfeld; A Delacasa; M Garrido; R Oliveri; E Mele; I Palacios; W O'Neill
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Eleven-year survival in the Veterans Administration randomized trial of coronary bypass surgery for stable angina.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-11-22       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Comparison of a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent with a bare metal stent in patients with complex coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Gregg W Stone; Stephen G Ellis; Louis Cannon; J Tift Mann; Joel D Greenberg; Douglas Spriggs; Charles D O'Shaughnessy; Samuel DeMaio; Patrick Hall; Jeffrey J Popma; Joerg Koglin; Mary E Russell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-09-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Long-term outcomes with drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in Sweden.

Authors:  Bo Lagerqvist; Stefan K James; Ulf Stenestrand; Johan Lindbäck; Tage Nilsson; Lars Wallentin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Twelve-year follow-up of survival in the randomized European Coronary Surgery Study.

Authors:  E Varnauskas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-08-11       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Drug-eluting stents vs. coronary-artery bypass grafting in multivessel coronary disease.

Authors:  Edward L Hannan; Chuntao Wu; Gary Walford; Alfred T Culliford; Jeffrey P Gold; Craig R Smith; Robert S D Higgins; Russell E Carlson; Robert H Jones
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.