Literature DB >> 18216353

Drug-eluting stents vs. coronary-artery bypass grafting in multivessel coronary disease.

Edward L Hannan1, Chuntao Wu, Gary Walford, Alfred T Culliford, Jeffrey P Gold, Craig R Smith, Robert S D Higgins, Russell E Carlson, Robert H Jones.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have compared the outcomes of two competing interventions for multivessel coronary artery disease: coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) and coronary stenting. However, little information has become available since the introduction of drug-eluting stents.
METHODS: We identified patients with multivessel disease who received drug-eluting stents or underwent CABG in New York State between October 1, 2003, and December 31, 2004, and we compared adverse outcomes (death, death or myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization) through December 31, 2005, after adjustment for differences in baseline risk factors among the patients.
RESULTS: In comparison with treatment with a drug-eluting stent, CABG was associated with lower 18-month rates of death and of death or myocardial infarction both for patients with three-vessel disease and for patients with two-vessel disease. Among patients with three-vessel disease who underwent CABG, as compared with those who received a stent, the adjusted hazard ratio for death was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65 to 0.97) and the adjusted survival rate was 94.0% versus 92.7% (P=0.03); the adjusted hazard ratio for death or myocardial infarction was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.89) and the adjusted rate of survival free from myocardial infarction was 92.1% versus 89.7% (P<0.001). Among patients with two-vessel disease who underwent CABG, as compared with those who received a stent, the adjusted hazard ratio for death was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.89) and the adjusted survival rate was 96.0% versus 94.6% (P=0.003); the adjusted hazard ratio for death or myocardial infarction was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.59 to 0.87) and the adjusted rate of survival free from myocardial infarction was 94.5% versus 92.5% (P<0.001). Patients undergoing CABG also had lower rates of repeat revascularization.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with multivessel disease, CABG continues to be associated with lower mortality rates than does treatment with drug-eluting stents and is also associated with lower rates of death or myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization. Copyright 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18216353     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa071804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  76 in total

1.  Surgical ineligibility and mortality among patients with unprotected left main or multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Stephen W Waldo; Eric A Secemsky; Cashel O'Brien; Kevin F Kennedy; Eugene Pomerantsev; Thoralf M Sundt; Edward J McNulty; Benjamin M Scirica; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  [Modern coronary surgery, the SYNTAX trial and updated guidelines].

Authors:  A Thiem; T Attmann; J Cremer
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.443

3.  Cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty and paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation for treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Klaus Bonaventura; Alexander W Leber; Christian Sohns; Mattias Roser; Leif-Hendrik Boldt; Franz X Kleber; Wilhelm Haverkamp; Marc Dorenkamp
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 4.  Revascularization for left main and multivessel coronary artery disease in the drug-eluting stent era: integration of recent drug-eluting stent trials.

Authors:  Samip Vasaiwala; David O Williams
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Best way to revascularize patients with main stem and three vessel lesions: patients should undergo PCI!

Authors:  Volker Schächinger; Christian Herdeg; Bruno Scheller
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  [Disappearing borders between cardiology and cardiothoracic surgery: status quo].

Authors:  R Bekeredjian; T Schilling; H A Katus; A Haverich
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Composite outcomes in coronary bypass surgery versus percutaneous intervention.

Authors:  Fred H Edwards; David M Shahian; Maria V Grau-Sepulveda; Frederick L Grover; John E Mayer; Sean M O'Brien; Elizabeth DeLong; Eric D Peterson; Charles McKay; Richard E Shaw; Kirk N Garratt; George D Dangas; John Messenger; Lloyd W Klein; Jeffrey J Popma; William S Weintraub
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 8.  Optimal revascularization for complex coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Javaid Iqbal; Patrick W Serruys; David P Taggart
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 32.419

9.  Therapeutic options in coronary artery disease: focusing on the guidelines.

Authors:  Leonard Schwartz
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.223

10.  Current trends in coronary revascularization.

Authors:  Shannon M Dunlay; Charanjit S Rihal; Thoralf M Sundt; Yariv Gerber; Véronique L Roger
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2009-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.