Literature DB >> 16098418

Five-year outcomes after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease: the final analysis of the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study (ARTS) randomized trial.

Patrick W Serruys1, Andrew T L Ong, Lex A van Herwerden, J Eduardo Sousa, Adib Jatene, Johannes J R M Bonnier, Jacques P M A Schönberger, Nigel Buller, Robert Bonser, Clemens Disco, Bianca Backx, Paul G Hugenholtz, Brian G Firth, Felix Unger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The long-term (five-year) comparative results of treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease with stenting or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is at present unknown.
BACKGROUND: The Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study (ARTS) was designed to compare CABG and stenting in patients with multivessel disease.
METHODS: A total of 1,205 patients with the potential for equivalent revascularization were randomly assigned to CABG (n = 605) or stent implantation (n = 600). The primary clinical end point was freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at one year; MACCE at five-year follow-up constituted the final secondary end point.
RESULTS: At five years, there were 48 and 46 deaths in the stent and CABG groups, respectively (8.0% vs. 7.6%; p = 0.83; relative risk [RR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71 to 1.55). Among 208 diabetic patients, mortality was 13.4% in the stent group and 8.3% in the CABG group (p = 0.27; RR, 1.61; 95% CI, 0.71 to 3.63). Overall freedom from death, stroke, or myocardial infarction was not significantly different between groups (18.2% in the stent group vs. 14.9% in the surgical group; p = 0.14; RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.58). The incidence of repeat revascularization was significantly higher in the stent group (30.3%) than in the CABG group (8.8%; p < 0.001; RR, 3.46; 95% CI, 2.61 to 4.60). The composite event-free survival rate was 58.3% in the stent group and 78.2% in the CABG group (p < 0.0001; RR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.60 to 2.28).
CONCLUSIONS: At five years there was no difference in mortality between stenting and surgery for multivessel disease. Furthermore, the incidence of stroke or myocardial infarction was not significantly different between the two groups. However, overall MACCE was higher in the stent group, driven by the increased need for repeat revascularization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16098418     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.12.082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  100 in total

1.  Previous percutaneous coronary intervention increases morbidity after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Gaurav S Mehta; Damien J LaPar; Castigliano M Bhamidipati; John A Kern; Irving L Kron; Gilbert R Upchurch; Gorav Ailawadi
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 2.  Revascularization for left main and multivessel coronary artery disease in the drug-eluting stent era: integration of recent drug-eluting stent trials.

Authors:  Samip Vasaiwala; David O Williams
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Percutaneous coronary intervention in the elderly.

Authors:  Tracy Y Wang; Antonio Gutierrez; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Trends in postacute myocardial infarction management and mortality in patients with diabetes. A population-based study from 1995 to 2001.

Authors:  Najwa Ouhoummane; Belkacem Abdous; Rabia Louchini; Louis Rochette; Paul Poirier
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.223

5.  Charts versus Discharge ICD-10 Coding for Sternal Wound Infection Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Authors:  Danielle A Southern; Christopher Doherty; Michael A De Souza; Hude Quan; A Robertson Harrop; Duncan Nickerson; Doreen Rabi
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2015-07-01

6.  Description of a Heart Team approach to coronary revascularization and its beneficial long-term effect on clinical events after PCI.

Authors:  Tassilo Bonzel; Volker Schächinger; Hilmar Dörge
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  Characteristics and outcomes of revascularized patients with hypertension: an international verapamil SR-trandolapril substudy.

Authors:  Scott J Denardo; Franz H Messerli; Efrain Gaxiola; Juan M Aranda; Rhonda M Cooper-Dehoff; Eileen M Handberg; Yan Gong; Annette Champion; Qian Zhou; Carl J Pepine
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 8.  Percutaneous versus surgical interventions for coronary artery disease in those with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Ozlem Soran
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Medication, reperfusion therapy and survival in a community-based setting of hospitalised myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Emily C O'Brien; Kathryn M Rose; Chirayath M Suchindran; Til Stürmer; Patricia P Chang; Lloyd Chambless; Cameron S Guild; Wayne D Rosamond
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 10.  Chronic coronary artery disease: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Andrew Cassar; David R Holmes; Charanjit S Rihal; Bernard J Gersh
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.