Benjamin Fine1, Susan E Schultz1, Lawrence White1, David Henry1. 1. Affiliations: Department of Medical Imaging (Fine, White), University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Schultz, Henry); Joint Department of Medical Imaging (Fine, White), University Health Network/Mount Sinai Hospital/Women's College Hospital; Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Henry) and Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Henry), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice (Henry), Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia; Department of Diagnostic Imaging (Fine), Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ont.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In 2012, the Ontario government withdrew public insurance coverage of imaging tests for uncomplicated low back pain. We studied the impact of this restriction on test ordering by physicians. METHODS: We compared the numbers of lumbar spine radiography, computed tomography (CT) and single-segment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies ordered by physicians in the 3 years before and after the policy change. We linked claims data from the Ontario Health Insurance Program with physician details to calculate rates per test-ordering physician. We compared changes in rates of monthly test ordering by family physicians and specialists before and after the policy change using segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series data. RESULTS: The number of lumbar spine radiography and spine CT studies ordered by family physicians decreased by 98 597 (28.7%) and 17 499 (28.7%), respectively, in the year after the policy change; there was little change in ordering by specialists. The number of lumbar spine radiography studies ordered per family physician by month decreased by 0.81 tests (p < 0.001) after the intervention, followed by a smaller rebound increase that remained below baseline. Monthly ordering of spine CT per family physician declined by 0.1 tests (p < 0.001), and that of limited spine MRI rose before the intervention, decreased by 0.18 tests (p < 0.001) after the intervention, then started to rise again. Monthly ordering of limited spine MRI by specialists, which had been stable before the policy change, decreased by 0.1 tests per specialist (p < 0.001) afterward, then rose to preintervention levels. INTERPRETATION: The restriction in coverage of imaging tests caused a larger decrease in test ordering by family physicians than by specialists and a larger, more sustained reduction in the use of lumbar spine radiography and spine CT than of spine MRI. Copyright 2017, Joule Inc. or its licensors.
BACKGROUND: In 2012, the Ontario government withdrew public insurance coverage of imaging tests for uncomplicated low back pain. We studied the impact of this restriction on test ordering by physicians. METHODS: We compared the numbers of lumbar spine radiography, computed tomography (CT) and single-segment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies ordered by physicians in the 3 years before and after the policy change. We linked claims data from the Ontario Health Insurance Program with physician details to calculate rates per test-ordering physician. We compared changes in rates of monthly test ordering by family physicians and specialists before and after the policy change using segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series data. RESULTS: The number of lumbar spine radiography and spine CT studies ordered by family physicians decreased by 98 597 (28.7%) and 17 499 (28.7%), respectively, in the year after the policy change; there was little change in ordering by specialists. The number of lumbar spine radiography studies ordered per family physician by month decreased by 0.81 tests (p < 0.001) after the intervention, followed by a smaller rebound increase that remained below baseline. Monthly ordering of spine CT per family physician declined by 0.1 tests (p < 0.001), and that of limited spine MRI rose before the intervention, decreased by 0.18 tests (p < 0.001) after the intervention, then started to rise again. Monthly ordering of limited spine MRI by specialists, which had been stable before the policy change, decreased by 0.1 tests per specialist (p < 0.001) afterward, then rose to preintervention levels. INTERPRETATION: The restriction in coverage of imaging tests caused a larger decrease in test ordering by family physicians than by specialists and a larger, more sustained reduction in the use of lumbar spine radiography and spine CT than of spine MRI. Copyright 2017, Joule Inc. or its licensors.
Authors: Dean Chou; Dino Samartzis; Carlo Bellabarba; Alpesh Patel; Keith D K Luk; Jeannette M Schenk Kisser; Andrea C Skelly Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2011-10-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: John J You; Ian Purdy; Deanna M Rothwell; Raymond Przybysz; Jiming Fang; Andreas Laupacis Journal: Can Assoc Radiol J Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 2.248
Authors: Amanda M Hall; Samantha R Scurrey; Andrea E Pike; Charlotte Albury; Helen L Richmond; James Matthews; Elaine Toomey; Jill A Hayden; Holly Etchegary Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2019-05-07 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Amanda Hall; Helen Richmond; Andrea Pike; Rebecca Lawrence; Holly Etchegary; Michelle Swab; Jacqueline Y Thompson; Charlotte Albury; Jill Hayden; Andrea M Patey; James Matthews Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2021-07-02 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Carolyn W Swenson; Neil S Kamdar; Kristian Seiler; Daniel M Morgan Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2021-01-01 Impact factor: 1.913