Literature DB >> 18695592

The "portable" CDR: translating the clinical dementia rating interview into a PDA format.

James E Galvin1, Thomas M Meuser, Mary A Coats, Donald A Bakal, John C Morris.   

Abstract

The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) is a common rating system used in clinical trials and longitudinal research projects to rate the presence and severity of cognitive problems in Alzheimer disease and related disorders. The interview process requires training and can be time-consuming. Here, we describe the validity, reliability, and discriminative ability of a computer-generated CDR using a personal digital assistant format. This project used clinical data from 138 archival and live evaluations (patient and informant interviews) collected for research purposes at Washington University to develop and test a software-based system for the administration and automatic scoring of the CDR. The system was programmed for use on a hand-held computer via the Palm Operating System. We developed domain-specific algorithms to quantify and translate clinical scoring decisions for the 3 cognitive (Memory, Orientation, Judgment and Problem Solving) and the 3 functional (Community Affairs, Home and Hobbies, Personal Care) domains of the CDR. An acceptable set of algorithms were developed using data from 104 research cases, reflecting a range of impairment levels (CDR 0 to 3) and expert scoring decisions. These algorithms were then tested for accuracy in a validation sample of 34 cases. The computer-generated CDR has excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.94 to 0.98) and interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient ranging from 0.88 to 0.96). The computer-generated CDR showed excellent discrimination between demented and nondemented cases (Area under the curve=0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.1). The computer-generated CDR using a Palm Operating System is easy to use, valid, and reliable. The level of agreement compares favorably to published interrater reliability data for the CDR. Software-based administration and automatic scoring of the CDR is a viable alternative to paper-based methods and may be useful in research and clinical settings, especially where electronic data management and reliability in scoring are critical.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18695592      PMCID: PMC2798727          DOI: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e31817634a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord        ISSN: 0893-0341            Impact factor:   2.703


  11 in total

1.  Reliability of clinical nurse specialists in the staging of dementia.

Authors:  M M McCulla; M Coats; N Van Fleet; J Duchek; E Grant; J C Morris
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1989-11

2.  Reliability of the Washington University Clinical Dementia Rating.

Authors:  W J Burke; J P Miller; E H Rubin; J C Morris; L A Coben; J Duchek; I G Wittels; L Berg
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1988-01

3.  Clinical dementia rating training and reliability in multicenter studies: the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study experience.

Authors:  J C Morris; C Ernesto; K Schafer; M Coats; S Leon; M Sano; L J Thal; P Woodbury
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules.

Authors:  J C Morris
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia.

Authors:  C P Hughes; L Berg; W L Danziger; L A Coben; R L Martin
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 9.319

Review 6.  Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  R C Petersen; R Doody; A Kurz; R C Mohs; J C Morris; P V Rabins; K Ritchie; M Rossor; L Thal; B Winblad
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2001-12

7.  Mild cognitive impairment represents early-stage Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  J C Morris; M Storandt; J P Miller; D W McKeel; J L Price; E H Rubin; L Berg
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2001-03

8.  Interrater reliability of the Clinical Dementia Rating in a multicenter trial.

Authors:  K Rockwood; D Strang; C MacKnight; R Downer; J C Morris
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Validity and reliability of the AD8 informant interview in dementia.

Authors:  James E Galvin; Catherine M Roe; Chengjie Xiong; John C Morris
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Accuracy of collateral source reports in very mild to mild dementia of the Alzheimer type.

Authors:  Pamela Z Cacchione; Kimberly K Powlishta; Elizabeth A Grant; Virginia D Buckles; John C Morris
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.562

View more
  2 in total

1.  Short-Term Effects of a Deterioration of General Health on the Oral Health of Nursing-Home Residents.

Authors:  Anna-Luisa Klotz; Melania Zajac; Judith Ehret; Samuel Kilian; Peter Rammelsberg; Andreas Zenthöfer
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 4.458

2.  Sum of boxes of the clinical dementia rating scale highly predicts conversion or reversion in predementia stages.

Authors:  Ray-Chang Tzeng; Yu-Wan Yang; Kai-Cheng Hsu; Hsin-Te Chang; Pai-Yi Chiu
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 5.702

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.