Literature DB >> 18693923

Adaptive classifiers, topic drifts and GO annotations.

Padmini Srinivasan1.   

Abstract

Gene annotations with Gene Ontology codes offer scientists important options in their study of genes and their functions. Automatic GO annotation methods have the potential to supplement the intensive manual annotation processes. Annotation approaches using MEDLINE documents are generally two-phased where the first is to annotate documents with GO codes and the second is to annotate gene products via the documents. In this paper we study document annotation with GO codes using a temporal perspective. Specifically, we build adaptive code-specific classifiers. We also study topic drift i.e., changes in the contextual characteristics of annotations over time. We show that topic drift is significant especially in the biological process GO hierarchy. This at least partially explains the particular challenges faced with codes of this hierarchy.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18693923      PMCID: PMC2655805     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  9 in total

1.  Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium.

Authors:  M Ashburner; C A Ball; J A Blake; D Botstein; H Butler; J M Cherry; A P Davis; K Dolinski; S S Dwight; J T Eppig; M A Harris; D P Hill; L Issel-Tarver; A Kasarskis; S Lewis; J C Matese; J E Richardson; M Ringwald; G M Rubin; G Sherlock
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Large-scale protein annotation through gene ontology.

Authors:  Hanqing Xie; Alon Wasserman; Zurit Levine; Amit Novik; Vladimir Grebinskiy; Avi Shoshan; Liat Mintz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  AffyMiner: mining differentially expressed genes and biological knowledge in GeneChip microarray data.

Authors:  Guoqing Lu; The V Nguyen; Yuannan Xia; Michael Fromm
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Evaluation of BioCreAtIvE assessment of task 2.

Authors:  Christian Blaschke; Eduardo Andres Leon; Martin Krallinger; Alfonso Valencia
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-05-24       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Retrieval with gene queries.

Authors:  Aditya K Sehgal; Padmini Srinivasan
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Mining protein function from text using term-based support vector machines.

Authors:  Simon B Rice; Goran Nenadic; Benjamin J Stapley
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-05-24       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Overview of BioCreAtIvE: critical assessment of information extraction for biology.

Authors:  Lynette Hirschman; Alexander Yeh; Christian Blaschke; Alfonso Valencia
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-05-24       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Learning statistical models for annotating proteins with function information using biomedical text.

Authors:  Soumya Ray; Mark Craven
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-05-24       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  GO for gene documents.

Authors:  Padmini Srinivasan; Xin Ying Qiu
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Cross-topic learning for work prioritization in systematic review creation and update.

Authors:  Aaron M Cohen; Kyle Ambert; Marian McDonagh
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  A Prospective Evaluation of an Automated Classification System to Support Evidence-based Medicine and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Aaron M Cohen; Kyle Ambert; Marian McDonagh
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2010-11-13

3.  Studying the potential impact of automated document classification on scheduling a systematic review update.

Authors:  Aaron M Cohen; Kyle Ambert; Marian McDonagh
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 2.796

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.