Literature DB >> 18693866

Towards consumer-friendly PHRs: patients' experience with reviewing their health records.

Alla Keselman1, Laura Slaughter, Catherine Arnott Smith, Hyeoneui Kim, Guy Divita, Allen Browne, Christopher Tsai, Qing Zeng-Treitler.   

Abstract

Consumer-friendly Personal Health Records (PHRs) have the potential of providing patients with the basis for taking an active role in their healthcare. However, few studies focused on the features that make health records comprehensible for lay audiences. This paper presents a survey of patients' experience with reviewing their health records, in order to identify barriers to optimal record use. The data are analyzed via descriptive statistical and thematic analysis. The results point to providers' notes, laboratory test results and radiology reports as the most difficult records sections for lay reviewers. Professional medical terminology, lack of explanations of complex concepts (e.g., lab test ranges) and suboptimal data ordering emerge as the most common comprehension barriers. While most patients today access their records in paper format, electronic PHRs present much more opportunities for providing comprehension support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18693866      PMCID: PMC2655877     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  7 in total

1.  Making texts in electronic health records comprehensible to consumers: a prototype translator.

Authors:  Qing Zeng-Treitler; Sergey Goryachev; Hyeoneui Kim; Alla Keselman; Douglas Rosendale
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

Review 2.  The communication goals and needs of cancer patients: a review.

Authors:  Thomas F Hack; Lesley F Degner; Patricia A Parker
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Patient-centered design for a personal health record system.

Authors:  D T Tran; X Zhang; A Stolyar; W B Lober
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

4.  Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption.

Authors:  Paul C Tang; Joan S Ash; David W Bates; J Marc Overhage; Daniel Z Sands
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Patient-perceived usefulness of online electronic medical records: employing grounded theory in the development of information and communication technologies for use by patients living with chronic illness.

Authors:  Warren J Winkelman; Kevin J Leonard; Peter G Rossos
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-01-31       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  An "infobutton" for enabling patients to interpret on-line Pap smear reports.

Authors:  D M Baorto; J J Cimino
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

7.  Patient experiences and attitudes about access to a patient electronic health care record and linked web messaging.

Authors:  Andrea Hassol; James M Walker; David Kidder; Kim Rokita; David Young; Steven Pierdon; Deborah Deitz; Sarah Kuck; Eduardo Ortiz
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 4.497

  7 in total
  33 in total

1.  Patient Experiences Using an Inpatient Personal Health Record.

Authors:  Janet Woollen; Jennifer Prey; Lauren Wilcox; Alexander Sackeim; Susan Restaino; Syed T Raza; Suzanne Bakken; Steven Feiner; George Hripcsak; David Vawdrey
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Making texts in electronic health records comprehensible to consumers: a prototype translator.

Authors:  Qing Zeng-Treitler; Sergey Goryachev; Hyeoneui Kim; Alla Keselman; Douglas Rosendale
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

3.  Interventions to increase patient portal use in vulnerable populations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lisa V Grossman; Ruth M Masterson Creber; Natalie C Benda; Drew Wright; David K Vawdrey; Jessica S Ancker
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  A classification of errors in lay comprehension of medical documents.

Authors:  Alla Keselman; Catherine Arnott Smith
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  A method for harmonization of clinical abbreviation and acronym sense inventories.

Authors:  Lisa V Grossman; Elliot G Mitchell; George Hripcsak; Chunhua Weng; David K Vawdrey
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  Patient-directed Internet-based Medical Image Exchange: Experience from an Initial Multicenter Implementation.

Authors:  Giampaolo Greco; Anand S Patel; Sara C Lewis; Wei Shi; Rehana Rasul; Mary Torosyan; Bradley J Erickson; Atheeth Hiremath; Alan J Moskowitz; Wyatt M Tellis; Eliot L Siegel; Ronald L Arenson; David S Mendelson
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  PORTER: a Prototype System for Patient-Oriented Radiology Reporting.

Authors:  Seong Cheol Oh; Tessa S Cook; Charles E Kahn
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  No change in physician dictation patterns when visit notes are made available online for patients.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Kind; Jinnet B Fowles; Cheryl E Craft; Allan C Kind; Sara A Richter
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  The military health system's personal health record pilot with Microsoft HealthVault and Google Health.

Authors:  Nhan V Do; Rick Barnhill; Kimberly A Heermann-Do; Keith L Salzman; Ronald W Gimbel
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Creating patient-centered radiology reports to empower patients undergoing prostate magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Nathan Perlis; Antonio Finelli; Mike Lovas; Alejandro Berlin; Janet Papadakos; Sangeet Ghai; Vasiliki Bakas; Shabbir Alibhai; Odelia Lee; Adam Badzynski; David Wiljer; Alexis Lund; Amelia Di Meo; Joseph Cafazzo; Masoom Haider
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.