OBJECTIVES: In light of the ongoing discussion about flow-mediated arterial remodeling, it was the aim of this report to demonstrate the detailed assessment of 3-dimensional vascular hemodynamics by high-field magnetic resonance imaging in healthy volunteers and to illustrate its potential in comparison with results in a patient with stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All examinations consisted of flow-sensitive 4-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla. Retrospective blood flow visualization and segmental quantification of wall shear stress and oscillatory shear index were performed. The results from 11 healthy individuals were compared with a 13-year-old patient with aortic stenosis who received a combined protocol with time-resolved 3-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography before and 5 and 9 months after intervention. RESULTS: Evaluation of normal blood flow characteristics demonstrated predominantly right-handed helical flow in the ascending aorta. Vortex formation was observed in 1 of 11 volunteers. Consistently high segmental wall shear stress was found along the circumference of the ascending aorta (average wall shear stress = 0.191 +/- 0.06 N/m(2)) and descending aorta (average 0.191 +/- 0.06 N/m(2)). Compared with volunteers, the patient revealed substantial flow changes proximal and distal to the stenosis. Blood flow alterations in the ascending aorta were also observed associated with changes in velocities and wall shear stress that gradually normalized after intervention. CONCLUSION: Flow-sensitive 4-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla can provide deeper insights into hemodynamic alterations in the diagnosis and follow-up of aortic pathologies. These findings indicate the potential of the methodology for the evaluation of effects of localized pathologies on the entire vascular system, which will have to be confirmed in future studies.
OBJECTIVES: In light of the ongoing discussion about flow-mediated arterial remodeling, it was the aim of this report to demonstrate the detailed assessment of 3-dimensional vascular hemodynamics by high-field magnetic resonance imaging in healthy volunteers and to illustrate its potential in comparison with results in a patient with stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All examinations consisted of flow-sensitive 4-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla. Retrospective blood flow visualization and segmental quantification of wall shear stress and oscillatory shear index were performed. The results from 11 healthy individuals were compared with a 13-year-old patient with aortic stenosis who received a combined protocol with time-resolved 3-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography before and 5 and 9 months after intervention. RESULTS: Evaluation of normal blood flow characteristics demonstrated predominantly right-handed helical flow in the ascending aorta. Vortex formation was observed in 1 of 11 volunteers. Consistently high segmental wall shear stress was found along the circumference of the ascending aorta (average wall shear stress = 0.191 +/- 0.06 N/m(2)) and descending aorta (average 0.191 +/- 0.06 N/m(2)). Compared with volunteers, the patient revealed substantial flow changes proximal and distal to the stenosis. Blood flow alterations in the ascending aorta were also observed associated with changes in velocities and wall shear stress that gradually normalized after intervention. CONCLUSION: Flow-sensitive 4-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla can provide deeper insights into hemodynamic alterations in the diagnosis and follow-up of aortic pathologies. These findings indicate the potential of the methodology for the evaluation of effects of localized pathologies on the entire vascular system, which will have to be confirmed in future studies.
Authors: Pim van Ooij; Wouter V Potters; Aart J Nederveen; Bradley D Allen; Jeremy Collins; James Carr; S Chris Malaisrie; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-04-18 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Erik T Bieging; Alex Frydrychowicz; Andrew Wentland; Benjamin R Landgraf; Kevin M Johnson; Oliver Wieben; Christopher J François Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Dominique Tremblay; Charles M Cuerrier; Lukasz Andrzejewski; Edward R O'Brien; Andrew E Pelling Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Arjun Menon; Thomas J Eddinger; Hongfeng Wang; David C Wendell; Jeffrey M Toth; John F LaDisa Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2012-09-28 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Alex J Barker; Alejandro Roldán-Alzate; Pegah Entezari; Sanjiv J Shah; Naomi C Chesler; Oliver Wieben; Michael Markl; Christopher J François Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-06-27 Impact factor: 4.668