PURPOSE: To compare pulmonary artery flow using Cartesian and radially sampled four-dimensional flow-sensitive (4D flow) MRI at two institutions. METHODS: Nineteen healthy subjects and 17 pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) subjects underwent a Cartesian 4D flow acquisition (institution 1) or a three-dimensional radial acquisition (institution 2). The diameter, peak systolic velocity (Vmax), peak flow (Qmax), stroke volume (SV), and wall shear stress (WSS) were computed in two-dimensional analysis planes at the main, right, and left pulmonary artery. Interobserver variability, interinstitutional differences, flow continuity, and the hemodynamic measurements in healthy and PAH subjects were assessed. RESULTS: Vmax, Qmax, SV, and WSS at all locations were significantly lower (P < 0.05) in PAH compared with healthy subjects. The limits of agreement were 0.16 m/s, 2.4 L/min, 10 mL, and 0.31 N/m(2) for Vmax, Qmax, SV, and WSS, respectively. Differences between Qmax and SV using Cartesian and radial sequences were not significant. Plane placement and acquisition exhibited isolated, site-based differences between Vmax and WSS. CONCLUSIONS: 4D flow MRI was used to detect differences in pulmonary artery hemodynamics for PAH subjects. Flow and WSS in healthy and PAH subject cohorts were similar between Cartesian- and radial-based 4D flow MRI acquisitions with minimal interobserver variability.
PURPOSE: To compare pulmonary artery flow using Cartesian and radially sampled four-dimensional flow-sensitive (4D flow) MRI at two institutions. METHODS: Nineteen healthy subjects and 17 pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) subjects underwent a Cartesian 4D flow acquisition (institution 1) or a three-dimensional radial acquisition (institution 2). The diameter, peak systolic velocity (Vmax), peak flow (Qmax), stroke volume (SV), and wall shear stress (WSS) were computed in two-dimensional analysis planes at the main, right, and left pulmonary artery. Interobserver variability, interinstitutional differences, flow continuity, and the hemodynamic measurements in healthy and PAH subjects were assessed. RESULTS: Vmax, Qmax, SV, and WSS at all locations were significantly lower (P < 0.05) in PAH compared with healthy subjects. The limits of agreement were 0.16 m/s, 2.4 L/min, 10 mL, and 0.31 N/m(2) for Vmax, Qmax, SV, and WSS, respectively. Differences between Qmax and SV using Cartesian and radial sequences were not significant. Plane placement and acquisition exhibited isolated, site-based differences between Vmax and WSS. CONCLUSIONS: 4D flow MRI was used to detect differences in pulmonary artery hemodynamics for PAH subjects. Flow and WSS in healthy and PAH subject cohorts were similar between Cartesian- and radial-based 4D flow MRI acquisitions with minimal interobserver variability.
Authors: Andreas Harloff; Andrea Nussbaumer; Simon Bauer; Aurélien F Stalder; Alex Frydrychowicz; Cornelius Weiller; Jürgen Hennig; Michael Markl Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Michal Schäfer; Cynthia Myers; R Dale Brown; Maria G Frid; Wei Tan; Kendall Hunter; Kurt R Stenmark Journal: Curr Hypertens Rep Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 5.369
Authors: Evgeny A Zemskov; Qing Lu; Wojciech Ornatowski; Christina N Klinger; Ankit A Desai; Emin Maltepe; Jason X-J Yuan; Ting Wang; Jeffrey R Fineman; Stephen M Black Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2019-03-19 Impact factor: 8.401
Authors: Michal Schäfer; D Dunbar Ivy; Steven H Abman; Alex J Barker; Lorna P Browne; Brian Fonseca; Vitaly Kheyfets; Kendall S Hunter; Uyen Truong Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Richard M Friesen; Michal Schäfer; D Dunbar Ivy; Steven H Abman; Kurt Stenmark; Lorna P Browne; Alex J Barker; Kendall S Hunter; Uyen Truong Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Vitaly O Kheyfets; Michal Schafer; Chris A Podgorski; Joyce D Schroeder; James Browning; Jean Hertzberg; J Kern Buckner; Kendal S Hunter; Robin Shandas; Brett E Fenster Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-05-13 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Alejandro Roldán-Alzate; Christopher J Francois; Oliver Wieben; Scott B Reeder Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 3.959