Literature DB >> 18691942

Risk of developing proximal versus distal colorectal cancer after a negative colonoscopy: a population-based study.

Josh Lakoff1, Lawrence F Paszat, Refik Saskin, Linda Rabeneck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) overall is reduced for up to 10 years after a negative colonoscopy. The objective of this research was to determine the incidence of proximal and distal CRC after a negative complete colonoscopy.
METHODS: A cohort of Ontario residents aged 50 to 80 years who had a negative complete colonoscopy between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 1997, was identified by using linked administrative databases. Cohort members had no prior history of CRC, inflammatory bowel disease, or recent colonic resection. Each individual was followed up through December 31, 2005, and the relative rate (RR) of overall CRC, distal CRC, and proximal CRC was compared with the remaining Ontario population.
RESULTS: A cohort of 110,402 individuals with a negative complete colonoscopy was identified. The RR of CRC overall and the RR of distal CRC remained significantly lower than the Ontario population. For example, at year 14 the RR of distal CRC was 0.21 (95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.36). The RR of proximal CRC was significantly lower than the Ontario population in half of the follow-up years, mainly after 7 years of follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Over a 14-year follow-up period, negative complete colonoscopy was associated with a subsequent reduced incidence of CRC overall, and of incident CRC in the distal colon. However, the reduction in incidence of proximal CRC differed in magnitude and timing, and occurred in half the follow-up years, mainly after 7 years of follow-up. These results highlight an important limitation of colonoscopy in usual clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18691942     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  80 in total

1.  Patient- and procedure-related factors affecting proximal and distal detection rates for polyps and adenomas: results from 1603 screening colonoscopies.

Authors:  Christoph Schramm; Nadine Mbaya; Jeremy Franklin; Muenevver Demir; Fabian Kuetting; Ulrich Toex; Tobias Goeser; Hans-Michael Steffen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  FIT testing: an overview.

Authors:  Lukejohn W Day; Taft Bhuket; James Allison
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2013-11

3.  Recurrence with malignancy after endoscopic resection of large colon polyps with high-grade dysplasia: incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  Neal Mehta; Ashraf Abushahin; Meena Sadaps; Mohammad Alomari; John Vargo; Deepa Patil; Rocio Lopez; Matthew Kalady; Conor P Delaney; Emre Gorgun; James Church; Yutaka Saito; Carol A Burke; Amit Bhatt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Protective association of colonoscopy against proximal and distal colon cancer and patterns in interval cancer.

Authors:  Amandeep K Shergill; Erin E Conners; Kenneth R McQuaid; Sara Epstein; James C Ryan; Janak N Shah; John Inadomi; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  User's perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing quality colonoscopy services in Canada: a study protocol.

Authors:  Gilles Jobin; Marie Pierre Gagnon; Bernard Candas; Catherine Dubé; Anis Ben Abdeljelil; Sonya Grenier
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  Concerns and challenges in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening.

Authors:  Akeem O Adebogun; Christine D Berg; Adeyinka O Laiyemo
Journal:  Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2012-08

7.  Quality indicators for colorectal cancer screening for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen
Journal:  Tech Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-04

8.  Repeat colonoscopy's value in gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Parit Mekaroonkamol; Kimberly Jegel Chaput; Young Kwang Chae; Michael L Davis; Pojnicha Mekaroonkamol; Sherry Pomerantz; Philip O Katz
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-02-16

9.  Comparison of Pentax HiLine and Olympus Lucera systems at screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Alexey Chernolesskiy; David Swain; James C Lee; Gareth D Corbett; Ewen Ab Cameron
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-02-16

Review 10.  Interval cancers after colonoscopy-insights and recommendations.

Authors:  Silvia Sanduleanu; Ad M Masclee; Gerrit A Meijer
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 46.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.