Literature DB >> 18690637

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery.

K Gurusamy1, R Aggarwal, L Palanivelu, B R Davidson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical training has traditionally been one of apprenticeship. The aim of this review was to determine whether virtual reality (VR) training can supplement and/or replace conventional laparoscopic training in surgical trainees with limited or no laparoscopic experience.
METHODS: Randomized clinical trials addressing this issue were identified from The Cochrane Library trials register, Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, grey literature and reference lists. Standardized mean difference was calculated with 95 per cent confidence intervals based on available case analysis.
RESULTS: Twenty-three trials (mostly with a high risk of bias) involving 622 participants were included in this review. In trainees without surgical experience, VR training decreased the time taken to complete a task, increased accuracy and decreased errors compared with no training. In the same participants, VR training was more accurate than video trainer (VT) training. In participants with limited laparoscopic experience, VR training resulted in a greater reduction in operating time, error and unnecessary movements than standard laparoscopic training. In these participants, the composite performance score was better in the VR group than the VT group.
CONCLUSION: VR training can supplement standard laparoscopic surgical training. It is at least as effective as video training in supplementing standard laparoscopic training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18690637     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  71 in total

1.  Training otologic surgical skills through simulation-moving toward validation: a pilot study and lessons learned.

Authors:  Gregory J Wiet; Jeff C Rastatter; Sumit Bapna; Mark Packer; Don Stredney; D Bradley Welling
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2009-09

Review 2.  Systematic review of validity testing in colonoscopy simulation.

Authors:  James Ansell; John Mason; Neil Warren; Peter Donnelly; Neil Hawkes; Sunil Dolwani; Jared Torkington
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Simulation in surgical education.

Authors:  Vanessa N Palter; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Virtual reality in orthopaedics: is it a reality?

Authors:  Jay D Mabrey; Karl D Reinig; W Dilworth Cannon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Review of available methods of simulation training to facilitate surgical education.

Authors:  Badma Bashankaev; Sergey Baido; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  European consensus on a competency-based virtual reality training program for basic endoscopic surgical psychomotor skills.

Authors:  Koen W van Dongen; Gunnar Ahlberg; Luigi Bonavina; Fiona J Carter; Teodor P Grantcharov; Anders Hyltander; Marlies P Schijven; Alessandro Stefani; David C van der Zee; Ivo A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  How far will simulators be involved into training?

Authors:  M Pilar Laguna; Theodorus M de Reijke; Jean J de la Rosette
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  The efficacy of laparoscopic skills training in a Mobile Simulation Unit compared with a fixed site: a comparative study.

Authors:  Vicki Xafis; Wendy Babidge; John Field; Meryl Altree; Nicholas Marlow; Guy Maddern
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Role of cranial and spinal virtual and augmented reality simulation using immersive touch modules in neurosurgical training.

Authors:  Ali Alaraj; Fady T Charbel; Daniel Birk; Matthew Tobin; Mathew Tobin; Cristian Luciano; Pat P Banerjee; Silvio Rizzi; Jeff Sorenson; Kevin Foley; Konstantin Slavin; Ben Roitberg
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Impact of ultrasound-guided kidney biopsy simulation on trainee confidence and biopsy outcomes.

Authors:  Dalia Dawoud; Will Lyndon; Sylvie Mrug; John J Bissler; Michal Mrug
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.