Literature DB >> 19239813

How far will simulators be involved into training?

M Pilar Laguna1, Theodorus M de Reijke, Jean J de la Rosette.   

Abstract

The expansion of laparoscopy and endoscopic surgery has promoted a change in surgical skills acquisition. This review aims to identify problems that modulate surgical skills acquisition and the role of simulation in the current training programs. Social, medical, and working time constraints, together with patient safety issues, lead to a decreased availability of operating room (OR) training opportunities. Systematic reviews show that there is a positive "model to model" transfer of skills more evident for virtual reality (VR) simulation, although transfer from video tower exists for naïve trainees, both of which supplement standard laparoscopic training. VR to OR positive transfer is proven for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy, although not for all parameters analyzed. A mixed model integrating both types of trainers into surgical curricula may strengthen their respective possibilities. To what extent simulation will be included in the surgical training programs depends on development of objective and finer assessment tools and proficiency-based criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19239813     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-009-0019-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   3.092


  43 in total

1.  Validity of surgical simulation for the assessment of operative skill.

Authors:  A M Paisley; P J Baldwin; S Paterson-Brown
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Assessment of basic endoscopic performance using a virtual reality simulator.

Authors:  David M Wilhelm; Kenneth Ogan; Claus G Roehrborn; Jeffery A Cadeddu; Margaret S Pearle
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Randomized prospective blinded study validating acquistion of ureteroscopy skills using computer based virtual reality endourological simulator.

Authors:  James D Watterson; Darren T Beiko; James K Kuan; John D Denstedt
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Surgical competence and surgical proficiency: definitions, taxonomy, and metrics.

Authors:  Richard M Satava; Anthony G Gallagher; Carlos A Pellegrini
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators.

Authors:  F J Carter; M P Schijven; R Aggarwal; T Grantcharov; N K Francis; G B Hanna; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Assessing the skills of surgical residents using simulation.

Authors:  Mohsen Tavakol; Mohammad Ali Mohagheghi; Reg Dennick
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.891

7.  Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  A M Derossis; G M Fried; M Abrahamowicz; H H Sigman; J S Barkun; J L Meakins
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Integrating advanced laparoscopy into surgical residency training. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  What impact will shortened training have on urological service delivery?

Authors:  S R Payne; M B K Shaw
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Participants' opinions of laparoscopic training devices after a basic laparoscopic training course.

Authors:  Atul K Madan; Constantine T Frantzides; Christopher Tebbit; Roderick M Quiros
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  7 in total

1.  Electronic device for endosurgical skills training (EDEST): study of reliability.

Authors:  J B Pagador; J Uson; M A Sánchez; J L Moyano; J Moreno; P Bustos; J Mateos; F M Sánchez-Margallo
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Applied Research on Laparoscopic Simulator in the Resident Surgical Laparoscopic Operation Technical Training.

Authors:  Shangxi Fu; Xiao Liu; Li Zhou; Meisheng Zhou; Liming Wang
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 0.656

3.  Evaluation of the quality of transesophageal echocardiography images and verification of proficiency.

Authors:  Robina Matyal; Faraz Mahmood; Ziyad Omar Knio; Stephanie Jones; Lu Yeh; Rabina Amir; Ruma Bose; John D Mitchell
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2018-05-09

4.  Laparoscopic surgical skills are significantly improved by the use of a portable laparoscopic simulator: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  T J Johnston; B Tang; A Alijani; I Tait; R J Steele; J Ker; G Nabi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  How to conduct a successful workshop: The trainees' perspective.

Authors:  Michail Christodoulou; Stefanos Kachrilas; Ahmed Dina; Andreas Bourdoumis; Junaid Masood; Noor Buchholz; Athanasios Papatsoris
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2013-09-12

6.  Fast and automatic ultrasound simulation from CT images.

Authors:  Weijian Cong; Jian Yang; Yue Liu; Yongtian Wang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 2.238

7.  Evaluation of the quality of transesophageal echocardiography images and verification of proficiency

Authors:  Robina Matyal; Faraz Mahmood; Ziyad Omar Knio; Stephanie B Jones; Lu Yeh; Rabia Amir; Ruma Bose; John D Mitchell
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2018-09-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.