Literature DB >> 18688690

Isolated all-polyethylene patellar revisions for metal-backed patellar failure.

Ryan M Garcia1, Matthew J Kraay, Victor M Goldberg.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The outcome of isolated patellar component revisions after metal-backed patellar failure is variable with satisfactory results reported from 78% to 100%. To supplement information in the literature we determined the failure rate and the functional outcome based on the Knee Society clinical and roentgenographic evaluation systems of isolated patellar component revisions after metal-backed patellar component failure. We retrospectively reviewed 27 patients with 28 isolated patellar component revisions for metal-backed patellar component failure performed between 1988 and 2005. Twenty-five knees in 24 patients were available for review with a minimum followup of 24 months (mean, 90 months; range, 24-210 months). All knees were revised with a cemented all-polyethylene patellar component and all tibial polyethylene components were routinely exchanged. One failure (4%) occurred 122.6 months after the isolated patellar component revision secondary to femoral and tibial component loosening. The average Knee Society knee score improved from 73 to 89 points, whereas the average Knee Society function score improved from 56 to 65. Our data confirm those in the literature suggesting a successful outcome can be achieved with an isolated patellar component revision for metal-backed patellar component failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18688690      PMCID: PMC2565034          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0414-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  36 in total

1.  Serum titanium level for diagnosis of a failed, metal-backed patellar component.

Authors:  S S Leopold; R A Berger; L Patterson; A K Skipor; R M Urban; J J Jacobs
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Problems with cementless total knee arthroplasty at 11 years followup.

Authors:  R A Berger; J H Lyon; J J Jacobs; R M Barden; E M Berkson; M B Sheinkop; A G Rosenberg; J O Galante
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Metal-backed patellar components: a brief report on 10-year survival.

Authors:  B M Crites; M E Berend
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Impact of patellofemoral design on patellofemoral forces and polyethylene stresses.

Authors:  Darryl D D'Lima; Peter C Chen; Mark A Kester; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Isolated revision of the patellar component in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Seth S Leopold; Craig D Silverton; Regina M Barden; Aaron G Rosenberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Resurfacing versus not resurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty: 8- to 10-year results.

Authors:  David Mayman; Robert B Bourne; Cecil H Rorabeck; M Vaz; J Kramer
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system.

Authors:  F C Ewald
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Outcome of metal-backed cementless patellar components: the effect of implant design.

Authors:  M J Kraay; O J Darr; M J Salata; V M Goldberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Revision of failed metal-backed patellar component of Miller/Galante-I total knee prosthesis.

Authors:  M Kobori; S Kamisato; M Yoshida; K Kobori
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.601

10.  Revision and salvage patellar arthroplasty using a porous tantalum implant.

Authors:  Sam Nasser; Robert A Poggie
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [The third compartment in knee endoprosthetics: from denervation to replacement, which therapy is correct?].

Authors:  C Stärke; E F Röpke; C H Lohmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Late Onset Metallosis after Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty with Metal-Backed Patellar Component In Situ.

Authors:  Laurens Koonen; Lotte Duit-van den Belt; Kirsten Veenstra; Gijs van Hellemondt
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-04-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.