BACKGROUND: Discrimination has been shown as a major causal factor in health disparities, yet little is known about the relationship between perceived medical discrimination (versus general discrimination outside of medical settings) and cancer screening behaviors. We examined whether perceived medical discrimination is associated with lower screening rates for colorectal and breast cancers among racial and ethnic minority adult Californians. METHODS: Pooled cross-sectional data from 2003 and 2005 California Health Interview Survey were examined for cancer screening trends among African American, American Indian/Alaskan Native, Asian, and Latino adult respondents reporting perceived medical discrimination compared with those not reporting discrimination (n = 11,245). Outcome measures were dichotomous screening variables for colorectal cancer among respondents ages 50 to 75 years and breast cancer among women ages 40 to 75 years. RESULTS: Women perceiving medical discrimination were less likely to be screened for colorectal [odds ratio (OR), 0.66; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.64-0.69] or breast cancer (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.51-0.54) compared with women not perceiving discrimination. Although men who perceived medical discrimination were no less likely to be screened for colorectal cancer than those who did not (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.97-1.07), significantly lower screening rates were found among men who perceived discrimination and reported having a usual source of health care (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.28-0.32). CONCLUSIONS: These findings of a significant association between perceived racial or ethnic-based medical discrimination and cancer screening behaviors have serious implications for cancer health disparities. Gender differences in patterns for screening and perceived medical discrimination warrant further investigation.
BACKGROUND: Discrimination has been shown as a major causal factor in health disparities, yet little is known about the relationship between perceived medical discrimination (versus general discrimination outside of medical settings) and cancer screening behaviors. We examined whether perceived medical discrimination is associated with lower screening rates for colorectal and breast cancers among racial and ethnic minority adult Californians. METHODS: Pooled cross-sectional data from 2003 and 2005 California Health Interview Survey were examined for cancer screening trends among African American, American Indian/Alaskan Native, Asian, and Latino adult respondents reporting perceived medical discrimination compared with those not reporting discrimination (n = 11,245). Outcome measures were dichotomous screening variables for colorectal cancer among respondents ages 50 to 75 years and breast cancer among women ages 40 to 75 years. RESULTS:Women perceiving medical discrimination were less likely to be screened for colorectal [odds ratio (OR), 0.66; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.64-0.69] or breast cancer (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.51-0.54) compared with women not perceiving discrimination. Although men who perceived medical discrimination were no less likely to be screened for colorectal cancer than those who did not (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.97-1.07), significantly lower screening rates were found among men who perceived discrimination and reported having a usual source of health care (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.28-0.32). CONCLUSIONS: These findings of a significant association between perceived racial or ethnic-based medical discrimination and cancer screening behaviors have serious implications for cancer health disparities. Gender differences in patterns for screening and perceived medical discrimination warrant further investigation.
Authors: Luisa N Borrell; Catarina I Kiefe; David R Williams; Ana V Diez-Roux; Penny Gordon-Larsen Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2006-06-05 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Kathryn A Phillips; Su-Ying Liang; Uri Ladabaum; Jennifer Haas; Karla Kerlikowske; David Lieberman; Robert Hiatt; Mika Nagamine; Stephanie L Van Bebber Journal: Med Care Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Robert J Blendon; Tami Buhr; Elaine F Cassidy; Debra J Perez; Kelly A Hunt; Channtal Fleischfresser; John M Benson; Melissa J Herrmann Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2007 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Scarlett S Lin; Christina A Clarke; Angela W Prehn; Sally L Glaser; Dee W West; Cynthia D O'Malley Journal: Cancer Date: 2002-02-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Kenneth G Schellhase; Rodney A Sparapani; Purushottam W Laud; Joan M Neuner Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2007-02-12
Authors: Su-Ying Liang; Kathryn A Phillips; Mika Nagamine; Uri Ladabaum; Jennifer S Haas Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2006-09-15 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Sarah Stark Casagrande; Tiffany L Gary; Thomas A LaVeist; Darrell J Gaskin; Lisa A Cooper Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Monica E Peek; Shannon C Wilson; Jada Bussey-Jones; Monica Lypson; Kristina Cordasco; Elizabeth A Jacobs; Cedric Bright; Arleen F Brown Journal: Acad Med Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Ricci Harris; Donna Cormack; Martin Tobias; Li-Chia Yeh; Natalie Talamaivao; Joanna Minster; Roimata Timutimu Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-03-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Thu Quach; Amani Nuru-Jeter; Pagan Morris; Laura Allen; Sarah J Shema; June K Winters; Gem M Le; Scarlett Lin Gomez Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-03-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Louis A Penner; John F Dovidio; Nao Hagiwara; Tanina Foster; Terrance L Albrecht; Robert A Chapman; Susan Eggly Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2016
Authors: Cristina Valdovinos; Frank J Penedo; Carmen R Isasi; Molly Jung; Robert C Kaplan; Rebeca Espinoza Giacinto; Patricia Gonzalez; Vanessa L Malcarne; Krista Perreira; Hugo Salgado; Melissa A Simon; Lisa M Wruck; Heather A Greenlee Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Hector M González; William A Vega; Michael A Rodríguez; Wassim Tarraf; William M Sribney Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 5.128