BACKGROUND: Information is limited for Asian subgroups regarding survival after diagnosis of the common cancers amenable to routine screening. The authors examined survival after carcinomas of the prostate, colon/rectum, breast, and cervix separately for Chinese, Japanese, Filipinos, and non-Hispanic whites in the United States. METHODS: Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, the authors compared the distributions of stage at diagnosis and computed 5-year cause specific survival probabilities, overall and by stage of disease, for cancer patients whose diagnosis was in 1988-1994 and who were observed through 1997. RESULTS: Among males, Filipinos were more likely to be diagnosed with advanced stage colorectal and prostate carcinomas than other Asians and non-Hispanic whites; they also experienced worse survival after these cancers. This survival deficit occurred across all stages of colorectal carcinoma and remained apparent within distant stage prostate carcinoma. Among females, Chinese were less likely to receive diagnoses of early stage colorectal carcinoma than Japanese and Filipinas. In addition, their survival was consistently lower across more advanced stages of disease. Chinese also experienced somewhat worse survival after diagnosis of early stage cervical carcinoma. Japanese were more likely to be diagnosed with early stage carcinomas but also tended to experience better survival after prostate, colorectal, and breast carcinomas regardless of stage. CONCLUSIONS: Chinese, Japanese, and Filipinos experienced unequal survival after these screenable carcinomas, indicating that certain groups may benefit from more aggressive screening efforts. The heterogeneity of cancer outcomes observed within the community classified as Asian reinforces the need for cancer statistics to be reported for disaggregated subgroups. Copyright 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10319
BACKGROUND: Information is limited for Asian subgroups regarding survival after diagnosis of the common cancers amenable to routine screening. The authors examined survival after carcinomas of the prostate, colon/rectum, breast, and cervix separately for Chinese, Japanese, Filipinos, and non-Hispanic whites in the United States. METHODS: Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, the authors compared the distributions of stage at diagnosis and computed 5-year cause specific survival probabilities, overall and by stage of disease, for cancerpatients whose diagnosis was in 1988-1994 and who were observed through 1997. RESULTS: Among males, Filipinos were more likely to be diagnosed with advanced stage colorectal and prostate carcinomas than other Asians and non-Hispanic whites; they also experienced worse survival after these cancers. This survival deficit occurred across all stages of colorectal carcinoma and remained apparent within distant stage prostate carcinoma. Among females, Chinese were less likely to receive diagnoses of early stage colorectal carcinoma than Japanese and Filipinas. In addition, their survival was consistently lower across more advanced stages of disease. Chinese also experienced somewhat worse survival after diagnosis of early stage cervical carcinoma. Japanese were more likely to be diagnosed with early stage carcinomas but also tended to experience better survival after prostate, colorectal, and breast carcinomas regardless of stage. CONCLUSIONS: Chinese, Japanese, and Filipinos experienced unequal survival after these screenable carcinomas, indicating that certain groups may benefit from more aggressive screening efforts. The heterogeneity of cancer outcomes observed within the community classified as Asian reinforces the need for cancer statistics to be reported for disaggregated subgroups. Copyright 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10319
Authors: Annette E Maxwell; Roshan Bastani; Leda L Danao; Cynthia Antonio; Gabriel M Garcia; Catherine M Crespi Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-09-23 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Scarlett L Gomez; Jennifer L Kelsey; Sally L Glaser; Marion M Lee; Stephen Sidney Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Scarlett Lin Gomez; Christina A Clarke; Sarah J Shema; Ellen T Chang; Theresa H M Keegan; Sally L Glaser Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-03-18 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Thu Quach; Amani Nuru-Jeter; Pagan Morris; Laura Allen; Sarah J Shema; June K Winters; Gem M Le; Scarlett Lin Gomez Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-03-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Anne Marie McCarthy; Tamara Dumanovsky; Kala Visvanathan; Amy R Kahn; Maria J Schymura Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2010-06-03 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Annette E Maxwell; Leda L Danao; Reggie T Cayetano; Catherine M Crespi; Roshan Bastani Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Jennifer C Livaudais; Dawn L Hershman; Laurel Habel; Lawrence Kushi; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Christopher I Li; Alfred I Neugut; Louis Fehrenbacher; Beti Thompson; Gloria D Coronado Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 4.872