Literature DB >> 18686348

Kiwi Omnicup versus Malmstrom metal cup in vacuum assisted delivery: a randomized comparative trial.

Nor Azlin M Ismail1, Wan Shahrul L Saharan, Mahdy A Zaleha, Rohana Jaafar, Jamil A Muhammad, Zainul Rashid M Razi.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the success, clinical outcomes, and maternal and neonatal complications between the Kiwi Omnicup and the Malmstrom metal cup in vacuum assisted delivery.
METHODS: This was a prospective randomized comparative trial. Women who required vacuum assisted vaginal delivery were randomized into the Kiwi Omnicup (KO) group and the Malmstrom metal cup (MM) group. The vacuum assisted deliveries were conducted according to hospital protocol. Details of the procedure and delivery outcomes including success and complications were analyzed.
RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-four women were recruited - 85 were assigned to vacuum assisted delivery using the KO and 79 the MM. One hundred percent delivery success was achieved with no significant differences between the two instruments in terms of maternal morbidity (P = 0.66). Six women in the MM group sustained post delivery complications in comparison to five in the KO group. Three babies were diagnosed with birth asphyxia in each group. More babies in the MM group were admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) (10 babies versus 5 babies) and suffered complications (14 versus 12 babies), compared to the KO group, although the difference was not statistically significant. There were no intrapartum or neonatal deaths and of those admitted to the NICU, all were discharged within a week without any serious consequences.
CONCLUSION: Kiwi Omnicup is an effective alternative to the currently available Malmstrom metal cup for vacuum assisted delivery with no increase in maternal or neonatal morbidity or mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18686348     DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2007.00701.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res        ISSN: 1341-8076            Impact factor:   1.730


  7 in total

1.  Vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Unzila A Ali; Errol R Norwitz
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

2.  Comparison of Obstetric Efficacy and Safety of the Kiwi OmniCup with Conventional Vacuum Extraction.

Authors:  W Siggelkow; N Schwarz; M W Beckmann; S Kehl; F Faschingbauer; R L Schild
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 3.  Instruments for assisted vaginal birth.

Authors:  Ganga L Verma; Jessica J Spalding; Marc D Wilkinson; G Justus Hofmeyr; Valerie Vannevel; Fidelma O'Mahony
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-24

4.  A randomized comparison of video demonstration versus hands-on training of medical students for vacuum delivery using Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS).

Authors:  Ziad Hilal; Anne K Kumpernatz; Günther A Rezniczek; Cem Cetin; Eva-Katrin Tempfer-Bentz; Clemens B Tempfer
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 5.  Exploring the reporting standards of RCTs involving invasive procedures for assisted vaginal birth: A systematic review.

Authors:  Emily J Hotton; Sophie Renwick; Erik Lenguerrand; Julia Wade; Tim J Draycott; Joanna F Crofts; Natalie S Blencowe
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.435

6.  Clinical impact of the disposable ventouse iCup® versus a metallic vacuum cup: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Véronique Equy; Sandra David-Tchouda; Michel Dreyfus; Didier Riethmuller; Françoise Vendittelli; Victoire Cabaud; Bruno Langer; Jennifer Margier; Jean-Luc Bosson; Jean-Patrick Schaal
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Comparison of a practice-based versus theory-based training program for conducting vacuum-assisted deliveries: a randomized-controlled trial.

Authors:  Julian Marschalek; Lorenz Kuessel; Maria Stammler-Safar; Herbert Kiss; Johannes Ott; Heinrich Husslein
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 2.344

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.