Literature DB >> 19399290

Vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery.

Unzila A Ali1, Errol R Norwitz.   

Abstract

Approximately 5% (1 in 20) of all deliveries in the United States are operative vaginal deliveries. The past 20 years have seen a progressive shift away from the use of forceps in favor of the vacuum extractor as the instrument of choice. This article reviews in detail the indications, contraindications, patient selection criteria, choice of instrument, and technique for vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery. The use of vacuum extraction at the time of cesarean delivery will also be discussed. With vacuum extraction becoming increasingly popular, it is important that obstetric care providers are aware of the maternal and neonatal risks associated with such deliveries and of the options available to effect a safe and expedient delivery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Operative vaginal delivery; Vacuum; Vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery

Year:  2009        PMID: 19399290      PMCID: PMC2672989     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1941-2797


  57 in total

1.  Effect of angular traction on the performance of modern vacuum extractors.

Authors:  K L Muise; M A Duchon; R H Brown
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  A comparison of the morbidity of midforceps and cesarean delivery.

Authors:  R A Bashore; W H Phillips; C R Brinkman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Birth progression and traction forces developed under vacuum extraction after slow or rapid application of suction.

Authors:  L Svenningsen
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 2.435

4.  The vacuum extractor and forceps in obstetrics. A clinical study.

Authors:  J E Sjöstedt
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1967       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Influence of the duration of second stage labor on perinatal outcome and puerperal morbidity.

Authors:  W R Cohen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  A randomised prospective study comparing the new vacuum extractor policy with forceps delivery.

Authors:  R B Johanson; C Rice; M Doyle; J Arthur; L Anyanwu; J Ibrahim; A Warwick; C W Redman; P M O'Brien
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1993-06

7.  Soft cup vacuum extraction: a comparison of outlet delivery.

Authors:  D L Dell; S E Sightler; W C Plauché
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 8.  A meta-analysis of upright positions in the second stage to reduce instrumental deliveries in women with epidural analgesia.

Authors:  Christine L Roberts; Charles S Algert; Carolyn A Cameron; Siranda Torvaldsen
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.636

9.  Operative vaginal delivery: a comparison of forceps and vacuum for success rate and risk of rectal sphincter injury.

Authors:  Dana P Damron; Eleanor L Capeless
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  The influence of continuous epidural bupivacaine analgesia on the second stage of labor and method of delivery in nulliparous women.

Authors:  D H Chestnut; G E Vandewalker; C L Owen; J N Bates; W W Choi
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  16 in total

1.  Instrumental vaginal delivery in bauchi, northeast Nigeria.

Authors:  As Kadas; Ld Aliyu; Ma Hauwa
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2011-10

2.  Identifying the Best Way to Manage Labor.

Authors:  Alison G Cahill
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2017 May-Jun

3.  A prospective randomized study comparing maternal and fetal effects of forceps delivery and vacuum extraction.

Authors:  Shashank Shekhar; Neena Rana; Ranbir Singh Jaswal
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2012-08-28

4.  Subdural haematoma in neonates following forceps-assisted delivery: case series and review of the literature.

Authors:  Malik Zaben; S Manivannan; C Petralia; P Leach
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  An analysis of the effects of intrapartum factors, neonatal characteristics, and skin-to-skin contact on early breastfeeding initiation.

Authors:  Ying Lau; Pyai Htun Tha; Sarah Su Tin Ho-Lim; Lai Ying Wong; Peng Im Lim; Binte Zaini Mattar Citra Nurfarah; Shefaly Shorey
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  A meta-analysis of prognostic biomarkers in neonatal retinal hemorrhage.

Authors:  Yan Xu; Ying Wang; Shouqing Li
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  Attempted and Successful Vacuum-Assisted Vaginal Delivery by Prepregnancy Body Mass Index.

Authors:  Sebastian Z Ramos; Molly E Waring; Katherine Leung; Nili S Amir; Annika L Bannon; Tiffany A Moore Simas
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.623

8.  Preterm birth by vacuum extraction and neonatal outcome: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Katarina Åberg; Mikael Norman; Cecilia Ekéus
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Decreased neonatal pain response after vaginal-operative delivery with Kiwi OmniCup versus metal ventouse.

Authors:  E A Huhn; E Visca; D R Vogt; S von Felten; E M Tinner Oehler; C Bührer; D Surbek; R Zimmermann; I Hoesli
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Changes in cerebral oxygenation during early postnatal adaptation in newborns delivered by vacuum extraction measured by near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Tanja Karen; Martin Wolf; Rahel Nef; Daniel Haensse; Hans Ulrich Bucher; Gabriele Schulz; Jean-Claude Fauchère
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 2.125

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.