| Literature DB >> 18684330 |
Igor B Rogozin1, Kira S Makarova, Youri I Pavlov, Eugene V Koonin.
Abstract
A widespread and highly conserved family of apparently inactivated derivatives of archaeal B-family DNA polymerases is described. Phylogenetic analysis shows that the inactivated forms comprise a distinct clade among archaeal B-family polymerases and that, within this clade, Euryarchaea and Crenarchaea are clearly separated from each other and from a small group of bacterial homologs. These findings are compatible with an ancient duplication of the DNA polymerase gene followed by inactivation and parallel loss in some of the lineages although contribution of horizontal gene transfer cannot be ruled out. The inactivated derivative of the archaeal DNA polymerase could form a complex with the active paralog and play a structural role in DNA replication.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18684330 PMCID: PMC2527604 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6150-3-32
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Direct ISSN: 1745-6150 Impact factor: 4.540
Figure 1Inactivated derivatives of B-family DNA polymerases in archaea: inactivation of the principal catalytic motif and phylogeny. The right part of the figure shows the sequences of the essential Mg2+-binding motif of B-family DNA polymerases for two families of active archaeal polymerase (top and middle) and the inactivated derivative (bottom). The motifs are shown in the form of sequence LOGOs where the height of the amino acid symbols is a function of the frequency of the given amino acid in the given position [20,21]. The left part of the figure shows a phylogenetic tree for archaeal B-family DNA polymerases. Color code: purple, Euryarchaeota (E); green: Crenarchaeota (C); brown: organisms that might represent distinct arcaheal phyla: Nanoarchaeota (N), Korarchaeota (K), and Thaumoarchaeota (T); black, bacteria (B). Each organism is denoted by the full systematic name and the Gene Identifier (GI) number. Multiple sequence alignment of archaeal B-family polymerases (Additional File 1) was constructed using the MUSCLE program [22]. The tree was built using the maximum likelihood method implemented in the MOLPHY program [23] by local rearrangement of an original Fitch tree [24]. The same program was used to compute bootstrap values which are indicated (%) for selected major branches.