Literature DB >> 18683614

Common control by compound samples in conditional discriminations.

Luis Antonio Pérez-González1, Benigno Alonso-Alvarez.   

Abstract

We tested whether teaching control by single stimulus samples in conditional discriminations would result in common control of two-stimuli compound samples, and vice versa. In Experiment 1, 5 participants were first taught four single-sample conditional discriminations. The first conditional discrimination was as follows: given sample stimulus P1, select comparison stimulus A1 and not A2; given sample P2 select comparison A2 and not A1. The second conditional discrimination was as follows: given sample P1 select comparison B1 and not B2; given sample P2 select B2 and not B1. Different sample stimuli (Q1 and Q2) were used in the third and fourth conditional discriminations. Moreover, A1 and B1 were presented together as comparisons, such that, if Q1 was presented as the sample, A1 was correct and B1 was incorrect; and if Q2 was presented as the sample, B1 was correct and A1 was incorrect. A2 and B2 were also presented as comparisons. When Q1 was presented, A2 was correct and when Q2 was presented B2 was correct. After training with these four single stimulus sample discriminations, participants were tested with compound PQ samples presented with A1, A2, B1, and B2 as comparisons. If common control were established by the PQ stimuli, a participant would select A1 when P1Q1 was presented, A2 when P2Q1 was presented, B1 when P1Q2 was presented, and B2 when P2Q2 was presented. Such common control by PQ samples occurred in 4 of 5 participants. In Experiment 2, 4 participants were given reverse training. They were first taught to select the A1, A2, B1, and B2 stimuli in response to the appropriate PQ combinations and then probed on the single stimulus sample discriminations. All 4 participants were successful on this probe. Experiments 3 and 4 investigated the effects of teaching additional conditional discriminations with novel stimuli on subsequent transfer from the single-sample discriminations to performance on the compound-sample conditional discrimination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18683614      PMCID: PMC2441582          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2008.90-81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  15 in total

1.  Behavior analysis and linguistic productivity.

Authors:  Richard W Malott
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2003

2.  A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more than, and less than.

Authors:  S Dymond; D Barnes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Compound stimuli in emergent stimulus relations: Extending the scope of stimulus equivalence.

Authors:  M R Markham; M J Dougher
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Transfer of a conditional ordering response through conditional equivalence classes.

Authors:  E Wulfert; S C Hayes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Development and crossmodal transfer of contextual control of emergent stimulus relations.

Authors:  D C Lynch; G Green
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Reading and auditory-visual equivalences.

Authors:  M Sidman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1971-03

7.  Matching to complex stimuli under non-reinforced conditions: errorless transfer from identity to arbitrary matching tasks.

Authors:  P M Smeets; S Striefel
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1994-02

8.  Transfer of relational stimulus control in conditional discriminations.

Authors:  L A Pérez-González
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  A functional-analytic model of analogy: a relational frame analysis.

Authors:  Ian Stewart; Dermot Barnes-Holmes; Bryan Roche; Paul M Smeets
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  An analysis of generalized contextual control of conditional discriminations.

Authors:  Richard W Serna; Luis Antonio Pérez-González
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  6 in total

1.  Evaluating the evidence base for relational frame theory: a citation analysis.

Authors:  Simon Dymond; Richard J May; Anita Munnelly; Alice E Hoon
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2010

2.  Intraverbal behavior and verbal conditional discriminations in typically developing children and children with autism.

Authors:  Mark L Sundberg; Cindy A Sundberg
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2011

3.  Derived relational responding: a comparison of match-to-sample and the relational completion procedure.

Authors:  Simon Dymond; Robert Whelan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Learning to write without writing: writing accurate descriptions of interactions after learning graph-printed description relations.

Authors:  Jack Spear; Lanny Fields
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Using complex auditory-visual samples to produce emergent relations in children with autism.

Authors:  Nicole C Groskreutz; Allen Karsina; Caio F Miguel; Mark P Groskreutz
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2010-03

6.  An analysis of verbal stimulus control in intraverbal behavior: implications for practice and applied research.

Authors:  Svein Eikeseth; Dean P Smith
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2013
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.