PURPOSE: Tumour hypoxia and elevated glycolysis (Warburg effect) predict poor prognosis. Each parameter is assessable separately with positron emission tomography, but they are linked through anaerobic glycolysis (Pasteur effect). Here, we compare the oxygenation-dependent retention of fluoroazomycin arabinoside ([(18)F]FAZA), a promising but not well-characterised hypoxia-specific tracer, and fluorodeoxyglucose ([(18)F]FDG) in four carcinoma cell lines. METHODS: Cells seeded on coverslips were positioned in modified Petri dishes that allow physically separated cells to share the same tracer-containing medium pool. Following oxic, hypoxic or anoxic tracer incubation, coverslips were analysed for radioactivity ([(18)F]FDG + [(18)F]FAZA) or re-incubated in tracer-free oxygenated medium and then measured ([(18)F]FAZA). Next, we tested the reliability of [(18)F]FDG as a relative measure of glucose metabolic rate. Finally, from two cell lines, xenografts were established in mice, and the tracer distribution between hypoxic and well-oxygenated areas were deduced from tissue sections. RESULTS: Three hours of anoxia strongly stimulated [(18)F]FAZA retention with anoxic-to-oxic uptake ratios typically above 30. Three out of four cell lines displayed similar selectivity of [(18)F]FDG versus glucose, but oxic uptake and anoxic-to-oxic uptake ratio of [(18)F]FDG varied considerably. Although less pronounced, [(18)F]FAZA also showed superior in vivo hypoxia specificity compared with [(18)F]FDG. CONCLUSIONS: [(18)F]FAZA displays excellent in vitro characteristics for hypoxia imaging including modest cell-to-cell line variability and no binding in oxic cells. In contrast, the usability of [(18)F]FDG as a surrogate marker for hypoxia is questionable due to large variations in baseline (oxic) glucose metabolism and magnitudes of the Pasteur effects.
PURPOSE:Tumour hypoxia and elevated glycolysis (Warburg effect) predict poor prognosis. Each parameter is assessable separately with positron emission tomography, but they are linked through anaerobic glycolysis (Pasteur effect). Here, we compare the oxygenation-dependent retention of fluoroazomycin arabinoside ([(18)F]FAZA), a promising but not well-characterised hypoxia-specific tracer, and fluorodeoxyglucose ([(18)F]FDG) in four carcinoma cell lines. METHODS: Cells seeded on coverslips were positioned in modified Petri dishes that allow physically separated cells to share the same tracer-containing medium pool. Following oxic, hypoxic or anoxic tracer incubation, coverslips were analysed for radioactivity ([(18)F]FDG + [(18)F]FAZA) or re-incubated in tracer-free oxygenated medium and then measured ([(18)F]FAZA). Next, we tested the reliability of [(18)F]FDG as a relative measure of glucose metabolic rate. Finally, from two cell lines, xenografts were established in mice, and the tracer distribution between hypoxic and well-oxygenated areas were deduced from tissue sections. RESULTS: Three hours of anoxia strongly stimulated [(18)F]FAZA retention with anoxic-to-oxic uptake ratios typically above 30. Three out of four cell lines displayed similar selectivity of [(18)F]FDG versus glucose, but oxic uptake and anoxic-to-oxic uptake ratio of [(18)F]FDG varied considerably. Although less pronounced, [(18)F]FAZA also showed superior in vivo hypoxia specificity compared with [(18)F]FDG. CONCLUSIONS: [(18)F]FAZA displays excellent in vitro characteristics for hypoxia imaging including modest cell-to-cell line variability and no binding in oxic cells. In contrast, the usability of [(18)F]FDG as a surrogate marker for hypoxia is questionable due to large variations in baseline (oxic) glucose metabolism and magnitudes of the Pasteur effects.
Authors: Kaisa Lehtiö; Vesa Oikonen; Samuel Nyman; Tove Grönroos; Anne Roivainen; Olli Eskola; Heikki Minn Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2002-10-30 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Morand Piert; Hans-Jürgen Machulla; Maria Picchio; Gerald Reischl; Sybille Ziegler; Piyush Kumar; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Roswitha Beck; Alexander J B McEwan; Leonard I Wiebe; Markus Schwaiger Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Bernd Gagel; Patrick Reinartz; Ercole Dimartino; Michael Zimny; Michael Pinkawa; Payam Maneschi; Sven Stanzel; Kurt Hamacher; Heinz H Coenen; Michael Westhofen; Ulrich Büll; Michael J Eble Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Xiao-Feng Li; Yuanyuan Ma; Xiaorong Sun; John L Humm; C Clifton Ling; Joseph A O'Donoghue Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Marian Axente; Jun He; Christopher P Bass; Jerry I Hirsch; Gobalakrishnan Sundaresan; Jeffrey Williamson; Jamal Zweit; Andrei Pugachev Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2012-03-21 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Peter Lin; Myo Min; Mark Lee; Lois Holloway; Dion Forstner; Victoria Bray; Allan Fowler Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-12-21 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Johan Bussink; Johannes H A M Kaanders; Winette T A van der Graaf; Wim J G Oyen Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2011-01-25 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: L Heijmen; C J A Punt; E G W Ter Voert; L F de Geus-Oei; A Heerschap; J Bussink; C G J Sweep; V Zerbi; W J G Oyen; P N Span; O Boerman; H W M van Laarhoven Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 3.850