| Literature DB >> 18682737 |
Matthew T Bishop1, Diane L Ritchie, Robert G Will, James W Ironside, Mark W Head, Val Thomson, Moira Bruce, Jean C Manson.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The identification of transmission of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD) by blood transfusion has prompted investigation to establish whether there has been any alteration in the vCJD agent following this route of secondary transmission. Any increase in virulence or host adaptation would require a reassessment of the risk analyses relating to the possibility of a significant secondary outbreak of vCJD. Since there are likely to be carriers of the vCJD agent in the general population, there is a potential for further infection by routes such as blood transfusion or contaminated surgical instruments.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18682737 PMCID: PMC2478718 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002878
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Comparison of incubation periods in wild-type mice.
Incubation period plot comparison of vCJD (transfusion) case versus transmissions in wild-type mice of vCJD (BSE) from three sources. (Data shows mean incubation period±standard error of the mean. Open circles RIII line and open triangles VM line.)
Clinical and pathological assessment of wild-type mice.
| Inoculum | Mouse Line | Mice Inoculated | Positive for Clinical TSE Signs | Positive for TSE Vacuolation | Incubation Period (days±SEM) |
| vCJD(BSE) A | RIII | 20 | 17 | 17 | 352.76±9.78 |
| vCJD(BSE) B | RIII | 20 | 18 | 17 | 374.35±9.98 |
| vCJD(BSE) C | RIII | 21 | 17 | 16 | 381.88±6.07 |
| vCJD (transfusion) | RIII | 23 | 18 | 18 | 477.33±12.68 |
| vCJD(BSE) A | VM | 22 | 15 | 22 | 510.20±10.97 |
| vCJD(BSE) B | VM | 22 | 20 | 21 | 523.75±12.57 |
| vCJD(BSE) C | VM | 21 | 13 | 18 | 530.69±8.16 |
| vCJD (transfusion) | VM | 22 | 15 | 18 | 572.90±12.96 |
Wild-type mouse lines RIII and VM, inoculated with vCJD(BSE) and vCJD(transfusion) were assessed clinically and pathologically for signs of TSE and mean incubation periods calculated.
The group of 24 was reduced due to unavailability of some brain material for analysis.
Figure 2Vacuolation scoring in the mouse brain.
Lesion profile comparison of vCJD (transfusion) case versus vCJD (BSE) transmissions to identify similarities in vacuolar pathology levels and regional distribution in mouse brains. (mean score ±SEM; dashed line - vCJD (transfusion) case; solid lines – 3x vCJD (BSE) cases for wild-type mice (diamonds – vCJD(BSE) A; squares – vCJD(BSE) B; triangles – vCJD(BSE) C) and published vCJD (BSE) for HuMM transgenic; G1–G9 grey matter scoring regions; W1–W3 white matter scoring regions)
Figure 3Detection of abnormal PrP in the mouse brain.
Immunocytochemical detection of abnormal PrP deposition in hippocampus and thalamus (lateral posterior nucleus) of HuMM transgenic (with additional 40× magnification of florid plaque structure, see box lower left) and VM wild-type mice following inoculation with vCJD (BSE) and vCJD (transfusion) material. (Scale bar 200 µm, anti-PrP antibody 6H4)
Figure 4PrPSc typing by Western blot.
Brain homogenates from HuMM mice inoculated with both vCJD (BSE) and vCJD (transfusion) show similar mobility and glycosylation profile (type 2B) as material from vCJD patients. (T2B: control vCJD material; antibody: 6H4)