Literature DB >> 18680122

Finite sample adjustments in estimating equations and covariance estimators for intracluster correlations.

John S Preisser1, Bing Lu, Bahjat F Qaqish.   

Abstract

Bias-corrected covariance estimators are introduced in the context of an estimating equations approach for intracluster correlations among binary outcomes. Simulation study results show that the bias-corrected covariance estimators perform better than uncorrected sandwich estimators in terms of bias and coverage probabilities. Additionally, introduction of a matrix-based bias-correction into the estimating equations considerably improves point and interval estimation for the intracluster correlations. The methods are illustrated using data from a nested cross-sectional cluster trial on reducing underage drinking. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18680122     DOI: 10.1002/sim.3390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  11 in total

Review 1.  Review of Recent Methodological Developments in Group-Randomized Trials: Part 2-Analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Turner; Melanie Prague; John A Gallis; Fan Li; David M Murray
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Power calculation for analyses of cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes via generalized estimating equations.

Authors:  Linda J Harrison; Rui Wang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Power considerations for generalized estimating equations analyses of four-level cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Xueqi Wang; Elizabeth L Turner; John S Preisser; Fan Li
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 1.715

4.  Sample size considerations for GEE analyses of three-level cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Steven Teerenstra; Bing Lu; John S Preisser; Theo van Achterberg; George F Borm
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Design and analysis considerations for cohort stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a decay correlation structure.

Authors:  Fan Li
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Power and sample size requirements for GEE analyses of cluster randomized crossover trials.

Authors:  Fan Li; Andrew B Forbes; Elizabeth L Turner; John S Preisser
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Marginal modeling of cluster-period means and intraclass correlations in stepped wedge designs with binary outcomes.

Authors:  Fan Li; Hengshi Yu; Paul J Rathouz; Elizabeth L Turner; John S Preisser
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 5.279

8.  Impact of unequal cluster sizes for GEE analyses of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes.

Authors:  Zibo Tian; John S Preisser; Denise Esserman; Elizabeth L Turner; Paul J Rathouz; Fan Li
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 1.715

Review 9.  Mixed-effects models for the design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: An overview.

Authors:  Fan Li; James P Hughes; Karla Hemming; Monica Taljaard; Edward R Melnick; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 3.021

10.  Sample size considerations for matched-pair cluster randomization design with incomplete observations of continuous outcomes.

Authors:  Xiaohan Xu; Hong Zhu; Chul Ahn
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.