INTRODUCTION: Radiation dosimetry assessment often begins with measuring pharmaceutical biodistribution in rodents. The traditional approach to dosimetry in rodents involves a radioassay ex vivo of harvested organs at different time points following administration of the radiopharmaceutical. The emergence of small-animal positron emission tomography (PET) presents the opportunity for an alternative method for making radiodosimetry estimates previously employed only in humans and large animals. In the current manuscript, normal-tissue absorbed dose estimates for the 18F-labeled chemotherapy agent [18F]5-fluorouracil ([18F]5-FU) were derived by PET imaging- and by tissue harvesting-based methods in rats. METHODS: Small-animal PET data were acquired dynamically for up to 2 h after injection of [18F]5-FU in anesthetized rats (n=16). Combined polynomial and exponential functions were used to model the harvesting-based and imaging-based time-activity data. The measured time-activity data were extrapolated to modeled (i.e., Standard Man) human organs and human absorbed doses calculated. RESULTS: Organ activities derived by imaging-based and by harvesting-based methods were highly correlated (r>0.999) as were the projected human dosimetry estimates across organs (r=0.998) obtained with each method. The tissues calculated to receive highest radiation dose by both methods were related to routes of excretion (bladder wall, liver, and intestines). The harvesting-based and imaging-based methods yielded effective dose (ED) of 2.94E-2 and 2.97E-2 mSv/MBq, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Small-animal PET presents an opportunity for providing radiation dose estimates with statistical and logistical advantages over traditional tissue harvesting-based methods.
INTRODUCTION: Radiation dosimetry assessment often begins with measuring pharmaceutical biodistribution in rodents. The traditional approach to dosimetry in rodents involves a radioassay ex vivo of harvested organs at different time points following administration of the radiopharmaceutical. The emergence of small-animal positron emission tomography (PET) presents the opportunity for an alternative method for making radiodosimetry estimates previously employed only in humans and large animals. In the current manuscript, normal-tissue absorbed dose estimates for the 18F-labeled chemotherapy agent [18F]5-fluorouracil ([18F]5-FU) were derived by PET imaging- and by tissue harvesting-based methods in rats. METHODS: Small-animal PET data were acquired dynamically for up to 2 h after injection of [18F]5-FU in anesthetized rats (n=16). Combined polynomial and exponential functions were used to model the harvesting-based and imaging-based time-activity data. The measured time-activity data were extrapolated to modeled (i.e., Standard Man) human organs and human absorbed doses calculated. RESULTS: Organ activities derived by imaging-based and by harvesting-based methods were highly correlated (r>0.999) as were the projected human dosimetry estimates across organs (r=0.998) obtained with each method. The tissues calculated to receive highest radiation dose by both methods were related to routes of excretion (bladder wall, liver, and intestines). The harvesting-based and imaging-based methods yielded effective dose (ED) of 2.94E-2 and 2.97E-2 mSv/MBq, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Small-animal PET presents an opportunity for providing radiation dose estimates with statistical and logistical advantages over traditional tissue harvesting-based methods.
Authors: T A Deterding; J R Votaw; C K Wang; D Eshima; L Eshima; R Keil; E Malveaux; C D Kilts; M M Goodman; J M Hoffman Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: J Kissel; G Brix; M E Bellemann; L G Strauss; A Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss; R Port; U Haberkorn; W J Lorenz Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1997-08-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Omer Ugur; Paresh J Kothari; Ronald D Finn; Pat Zanzonico; Shutian Ruan; Ilonka Guenther; Helmut R Maecke; Steven M Larson Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Wei-Ann Hsueh; Amanda L Kesner; Anne Gangloff; Mark D Pegram; Malgorzata Beryt; Johannes Czernin; Michael E Phelps; Daniel H S Silverman Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Stig Palm; Richard M Enmon; Cornelia Matei; Katherine S Kolbert; Su Xu; Pat B Zanzonico; Ronald L Finn; Jason A Koutcher; Steven M Larson; George Sgouros Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Amanda L Kesner; Wei-Ann Hsueh; Nwe Linn Htet; Betty S Pio; Johannes Czernin; Mark D Pegram; Michael E Phelps; Daniel H S Silverman Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: F Bretin; T Mauxion; G Warnock; M A Bahri; L Libert; C Lemaire; A Luxen; M Bardiès; A Seret; A Plenevaux Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Francesco Cicone; David Viertl; Thibaut Denoël; Michael G Stabin; John O Prior; Silvano Gnesin Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2022-04-11 Impact factor: 3.138
Authors: Xiaoyun Zhou; Philip H Elsinga; Shivashankar Khanapur; Rudi A J O Dierckx; Erik F J de Vries; Johan R de Jong Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Francesco Cicone; Silvano Gnesin; Thibaut Denoël; Thierry Stora; Nicholas P van der Meulen; Cristina Müller; Christiaan Vermeulen; Martina Benešová; Ulli Köster; Karl Johnston; Ernesto Amato; Lucrezia Auditore; George Coukos; Michael Stabin; Niklaus Schaefer; David Viertl; John O Prior Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2019-06-11 Impact factor: 3.138