UNLABELLED: Paclitaxel is used as a chemotherapy drug for the treatment of various malignancies, including breast, ovarian, and lung cancers. To evaluate the potential of a noninvasive prognostic tool for specifically predicting the resistance of tumors to paclitaxel therapy, we examined the tumoral uptake of (18)F-fluoropaclitaxel ((18)F-FPAC) in mice bearing human breast cancer xenografts by using small-animal-dedicated PET and compared (18)F-FPAC uptake with the tumor response to paclitaxel treatment. METHODS: PET data were acquired after tail vein injection of approximately 9 MBq of (18)F-FPAC in anesthetized nude mice bearing breast cancer xenografts. Tracer uptake in reconstructed images was quantified by region-of-interest analyses and compared with the tumor response, as measured by changes in tumor volume, after treatment with paclitaxel. RESULTS: Mice with tumors that progressed demonstrated lower tumoral uptake of (18)F-FPAC than mice with tumors that did not progress or that regressed (r = 0.55, P < 0.02; n = 19), indicating that low (18)F-FPAC uptake was a significant predictor of chemoresistance. Conversely, high (18)F-FPAC uptake predicted tumor regression. This relationship was found for mice bearing xenografts from cell lines selected to be either sensitive or intrinsically resistant to paclitaxel in vitro. CONCLUSION: PET data acquired with (18)F-FPAC suggest that this tracer holds promise for the noninvasive quantification of its distribution in vivo in a straightforward manner. In combination with approaches for examining other aspects of resistance, such quantification could prove useful in helping to predict subsequent resistance to paclitaxel chemotherapy of breast cancer.
UNLABELLED: Paclitaxel is used as a chemotherapy drug for the treatment of various malignancies, including breast, ovarian, and lung cancers. To evaluate the potential of a noninvasive prognostic tool for specifically predicting the resistance of tumors to paclitaxel therapy, we examined the tumoral uptake of (18)F-fluoropaclitaxel ((18)F-FPAC) in mice bearing humanbreast cancer xenografts by using small-animal-dedicated PET and compared (18)F-FPAC uptake with the tumor response to paclitaxel treatment. METHODS:PET data were acquired after tail vein injection of approximately 9 MBq of (18)F-FPAC in anesthetized nude mice bearing breast cancer xenografts. Tracer uptake in reconstructed images was quantified by region-of-interest analyses and compared with the tumor response, as measured by changes in tumor volume, after treatment with paclitaxel. RESULTS:Mice with tumors that progressed demonstrated lower tumoral uptake of (18)F-FPAC than mice with tumors that did not progress or that regressed (r = 0.55, P < 0.02; n = 19), indicating that low (18)F-FPAC uptake was a significant predictor of chemoresistance. Conversely, high (18)F-FPAC uptake predicted tumor regression. This relationship was found for mice bearing xenografts from cell lines selected to be either sensitive or intrinsically resistant to paclitaxel in vitro. CONCLUSION:PET data acquired with (18)F-FPAC suggest that this tracer holds promise for the noninvasive quantification of its distribution in vivo in a straightforward manner. In combination with approaches for examining other aspects of resistance, such quantification could prove useful in helping to predict subsequent resistance to paclitaxel chemotherapy of breast cancer.
Authors: Betty S Pio; Cecilia K Park; Richard Pietras; Wei-Ann Hsueh; Nagichettiar Satyamurthy; Mark D Pegram; Johannes Czernin; Michael E Phelps; Daniel H S Silverman Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2006 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Helen Lee; Anthony F Shields; Barry A Siegel; Kathy D Miller; Ian Krop; Cynthia X Ma; Patricia M LoRusso; Pamela N Munster; Karen Campbell; Daniel F Gaddy; Shannon C Leonard; Elena Geretti; Stephanie J Blocker; Dmitri B Kirpotin; Victor Moyo; Thomas J Wickham; Bart S Hendriks Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Karen A Kurdziel; Joseph D Kalen; Jerry I Hirsch; John D Wilson; Harry D Bear; Jean Logan; James McCumisky; Kathy Moorman-Sykes; Stephen Adler; Peter L Choyke Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2011-08-17 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Adam L Kesner; Wei-Ann Hsueh; Johannes Czernin; Henry Padgett; Michael E Phelps; Daniel H S Silverman Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2008-08-05 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: S A Jansen; S D Conzen; X Fan; T Krausz; M Zamora; S Foxley; J River; G M Newstead; G S Karczmar Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2008-09-09 Impact factor: 3.609