Literature DB >> 24249641

Hybrid microPET imaging for dosimetric applications in mice: improvement of activity quantification in dynamic microPET imaging for accelerated dosimetry applied to 6-[18 F]fluoro-L-DOPA and 2-[18 F]fluoro-L-tyrosine.

F Bretin1, T Mauxion, G Warnock, M A Bahri, L Libert, C Lemaire, A Luxen, M Bardiès, A Seret, A Plenevaux.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dynamic microPET imaging has advantages over traditional organ harvesting, but is prone to quantification errors in small volumes. Hybrid imaging, where microPET activities are cross-calibrated using post scan harvested organs, can improve quantification. Organ harvesting, dynamic imaging and hybrid imaging were applied to determine the human and mouse radiation dosimetry of 6-[18 F]fluoro-L-DOPA and 2-[18 F]fluoro-L-tyrosine and compared. PROCEDURES: Two-hour dynamic microPET imaging was performed with both tracers in four separate mice for 18 F-FDOPA and three mice for 18 F-FTYR. Organ harvesting was performed at 2, 5, 10, 30, 60 and 120 min post tracer injection with n = 5 at each time point for 18 F-FDOPA and n = 3 at each time point for 18 F-FTYR. Human radiation dosimetry projected from animal data was calculated for the three different approaches for each tracer using OLINDA/EXM. S-factors for the MOBY phantom were used to calculate the animal dosimetry.
RESULTS: Correlations between dose estimates based on organ harvesting and imaging was improved from r = 0.997 to r = 0.999 for 18 F-FDOPA and from r = 0.985 to r = 0.996 (p < 0.0001 for all) for 18 F-FTYR by using hybrid imaging.
CONCLUSION: Hybrid imaging yields comparable results to traditional organ harvesting while partially overcoming the limitations of pure imaging. It is an advantageous technique in terms of number of animals needed and labour involved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24249641     DOI: 10.1007/s11307-013-0706-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol        ISSN: 1536-1632            Impact factor:   3.488


  24 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  1991

3.  NEMA NU4-2008 image quality performance report for the microPET focus 120 and for various transmission and reconstruction methods.

Authors:  Mohamed A Bahri; Alain Plenevaux; Geoffrey Warnock; André Luxen; Alain Seret
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Whole-body biodistribution kinetics, metabolism, and radiation dosimetry estimates of 18F-PEG6-IPQA in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Mei Tian; Kazuma Ogawa; Richard Wendt; Uday Mukhopadhyay; Julius Balatoni; Nobuyoshi Fukumitsu; Rajesh Uthamanthil; Agatha Borne; David Brammer; James Jackson; Osama Mawlawi; Bijun Yang; Mian M Alauddin; Juri G Gelovani
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  OLINDA/EXM: the second-generation personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine.

Authors:  Michael G Stabin; Richard B Sparks; Eric Crowe
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Fluorine-18-fluoro-L-DOPA dosimetry with carbidopa pretreatment.

Authors:  W D Brown; T R Oakes; O T DeJesus; M D Taylor; A D Roberts; R J Nickles; J E Holden
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Radiation dose estimates for [18F]5-fluorouracil derived from PET-based and tissue-based methods in rats.

Authors:  Adam L Kesner; Wei-Ann Hsueh; Johannes Czernin; Henry Padgett; Michael E Phelps; Daniel H S Silverman
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Evaluation of [18F]Mefway biodistribution and dosimetry based on whole-body PET imaging of mice.

Authors:  Cristian C Constantinescu; Evgueni Sevrioukov; Adriana Garcia; Min-Liang Pan; Jogeshwar Mukherjee
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Monte Carlo simulations of absorbed dose in a mouse phantom from 18-fluorine compounds.

Authors:  Richard Taschereau; Arion F Chatziioannou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Biodistribution, radiation dose estimates, and in vivo Pgp modulation studies of 18F-paclitaxel in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Karen A Kurdziel; Dale O Kiesewetter; Richard E Carson; William C Eckelman; Peter Herscovitch
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of absorbed dose extrapolation methods for mouse-to-human translation of radiolabelled macromolecules.

Authors:  Francesco Cicone; David Viertl; Thibaut Denoël; Michael G Stabin; John O Prior; Silvano Gnesin
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.138

2.  Radiation dosimetry of the α4β2 nicotinic receptor ligand (+)-[18F]flubatine, comparing preclinical PET/MRI and PET/CT to first-in-human PET/CT results.

Authors:  Mathias Kranz; Bernhard Sattler; Solveig Tiepolt; Stephan Wilke; Winnie Deuther-Conrad; Cornelius K Donat; Steffen Fischer; Marianne Patt; Andreas Schildan; Jörg Patt; René Smits; Alexander Hoepping; Jörg Steinbach; Osama Sabri; Peter Brust
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2016-10-21

3.  Internal radiation dosimetry of a 152Tb-labeled antibody in tumor-bearing mice.

Authors:  Francesco Cicone; Silvano Gnesin; Thibaut Denoël; Thierry Stora; Nicholas P van der Meulen; Cristina Müller; Christiaan Vermeulen; Martina Benešová; Ulli Köster; Karl Johnston; Ernesto Amato; Lucrezia Auditore; George Coukos; Michael Stabin; Niklaus Schaefer; David Viertl; John O Prior
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.138

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.