Literature DB >> 12452456

Influence of the subpubic arch angle on anal sphincter trauma and anal incontinence following childbirth.

Andrea Frudinger1, Steve Halligan, John A D Spencer, Clive I Bartram, Michael A Kamm, Raimund Winter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between the subpubic arch angle, anal sphincter and perineal trauma, and anal incontinence after childbirth in nulliparous women.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: University teaching hospital. SAMPLE: One hundred thirty-four low risk nulliparous women.
METHODS: Measurements of the bony pelvic outlet were made to calculate the subpubic arch angle. Endosonographic assessment of the perineum and anal sphincter was made before and after delivery. A specific bowel function questionnaire was completed before and after delivery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perineal and anal sphincter trauma, and deteriorating anal continence after delivery.
RESULTS: Thirty-two women with a subpubic arch angle of less than 90 degrees had significantly prolonged first and second stages of labour when compared with 102 women whose subpubic arch was wider. Following delivery, anal continence deteriorated in more women with a narrow subpubic angle (69% vs 21%, P < 0.001) but this was unrelated to the incidence of anal sphincter and perineal trauma.
CONCLUSIONS: A narrow subpubic arch is strongly associated with prolonged labour and postpartum anal incontinence in nulliparous women. However, perineal and anal sphincter trauma, assessed by ultrasound, does not account for the higher rate of postpartum analincontinence in women with a narrow subpubic arch angle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12452456     DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2002.01466.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  6 in total

1.  Dynamic 3T pelvic floor magnetic resonance imaging in women progressing from the nulligravid to the primiparous state.

Authors:  Mark E Lockhart; G Wright Bates; Desiree E Morgan; Timothy M Beasley; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Fecal incontinence: a review of prevalence and obstetric risk factors.

Authors:  Andrea Wang; Marsha Guess; Kathleen Connell; Kenneth Powers; George Lazarou; Magdy Mikhail
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-06-23

3.  Sphincter tears in primiparous women: is age a factor?

Authors:  C Bryce Bowling; Thomas L Wheeler Ii; Kimberly A Gerten; Victoria R Chapman; Kathryn L Burgio; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-11-05

4.  Comparison of vector symmetry index and endoanal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of anal sphincter disruption.

Authors:  D N Samarasekera; Y Wright; R H Lowndes; K P Stanley; P Preston; C T M Speakman
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Magnetic resonance assessment of pelvic anatomy and pelvic floor disorders after childbirth.

Authors:  Victoria L Handa; Mark E Lockhart; Kimberly S Kenton; Catherine S Bradley; Julia R Fielding; Geoffrey W Cundiff; Caryl G Salomon; Christiane Hakim; Wen Ye; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-10-10

6.  Comparison of bony dimensions at the level of the pelvic floor in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Tamara A Stein; Gurpreet Kaur; Aimee Summers; Kindra A Larson; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 8.661

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.