Literature DB >> 18679042

Production and perception of temporal patterns in native and non-native speech.

Tessa Bent1, Ann R Bradlow, Bruce L Smith.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined production and perception of English temporal patterns by native and non-native participants. Experiment 1 indicated that native and non-native (L1 = Chinese) talkers differed significantly in their production of one English duration pattern (i.e., vowel lengthening before voiced versus voice-less consonants) but not another (i.e., tense versus lax vowels). Experiment 2 tested native and non-native listener identification of words that differed in voicing of the final consonant by the native and non-native talkers whose productions were substantially different in experiment 1. Results indicated that differences in native and non-native intelligibility may be partially explained by temporal pat-tern differences in vowel duration although other cues such as presence of stop releases and burst duration may also contribute. Additionally, speech intelligibility depends on shared phonetic knowledge between talkers and listeners rather than only on accuracy relative to idealized production norms. (c) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18679042      PMCID: PMC3532030          DOI: 10.1159/000144077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phonetica        ISSN: 0031-8388            Impact factor:   1.759


  23 in total

1.  Variations in temporal patterns of speech production among speakers of English.

Authors:  B L Smith
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.

Authors:  J Sean Allen; Joanne L Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English.

Authors:  Constance M Clarke; Merrill F Garrett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects on the recognition of native and Spanish-accented words by native English and Spanish listeners.

Authors:  Satomi Imai; Amanda C Walley; James E Flege
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Talker-specific learning in speech perception.

Authors:  L C Nygaard; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-04

6.  Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence.

Authors:  D H Klatt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A comparison of temporal measures of speech using spectrograms and digital oscillograms.

Authors:  B L Smith; J Hillenbrand; D Ingrisano
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1986-06

8.  Differential use of temporal cues to the /s/-/z/ contrast by native and non-native speakers of English.

Authors:  J E Flege; J Hillenbrand
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination.

Authors:  Jessica Maye; Janet F Werker; LouAnn Gerken
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-01

10.  Acoustic-phonetic correlates of talker intelligibility for adults and children.

Authors:  Valerie Hazan; Duncan Markham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparing non-native and native speech: Are L2 productions more variable?

Authors:  Xin Xie; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Metrical perception of trisyllabic speech rhythms.

Authors:  Fernando Benadon
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-02-16

3.  More than a boundary shift: Perceptual adaptation to foreign-accented speech reshapes the internal structure of phonetic categories.

Authors:  Xin Xie; Rachel M Theodore; Emily B Myers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The Wildcat Corpus of native- and foreign-accented English: communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Melissa Baese-Berk; Rachel E Baker; Arim Choi; Midam Kim; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.500

5.  Audiovisual Speech Recognition With a Cochlear Implant and Increased Perceptual and Cognitive Demands.

Authors:  Anna R Tinnemore; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Listening with a foreign-accent: The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit in Mandarin speakers of English.

Authors:  Xin Xie; Carol A Fowler
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2013-09

Review 7.  Three challenges for future research on cochlear implants.

Authors:  David B Pisoni; William G Kronenberger; Michael S Harris; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-01-02

8.  Syllable Structure Universals and Native Language Interference in Second Language Perception and Production: Positional Asymmetry and Perceptual Links to Accentedness.

Authors:  Bing Cheng; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.