Literature DB >> 18677708

Accuracy and convergence of free energy differences calculated from nonequilibrium switching processes.

Maik Goette1, Helmut Grubmüller.   

Abstract

The molecular-dynamics-based calculation of accurate free energy differences for biomolecular systems is a challenging task. Accordingly, convergence and accuracy of established equilibrium methods has been subject of many studies, often focusing at small test systems. In contrast, the potential of more recently proposed nonequilibrium methods, derived from the Jarzynski and Crooks equalities, has not yet fully been explored. Here, we compare the performance of these methods by calculating free energy differences for test systems at different levels of complexity and varying extent of the involved perturbations. We consider the interconversion of ethane into methanol, the switching of a tryptophane-sidechain in a tripeptide, and the binding of two different ligands to the globular protein snurportin 1. On the basis of our results, we suggest and assess a new nonequilibrium free energy method, Crooks Gaussian Intersection (CGI), which combines the advantages of existing methods. CGI is highly parallelizable and, for the test systems considered here, is shown to outperform the other studied equilibrium and nonequilibrium methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18677708     DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  21 in total

1.  Protein thermostability calculations using alchemical free energy simulations.

Authors:  Daniel Seeliger; Bert L de Groot
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Molecular determinants of snurportin 1 ligand affinity and structural response upon binding.

Authors:  Maik Goette; Martin C Stumpe; Ralf Ficner; Helmut Grubmüller
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Mutation G1629E Increases von Willebrand Factor Cleavage via a Cooperative Destabilization Mechanism.

Authors:  Camilo Aponte-Santamaría; Svenja Lippok; Judith J Mittag; Tobias Obser; Reinhard Schneppenheim; Carsten Baldauf; Frauke Gräter; Ulrich Budde; Joachim O Rädler
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Microscopic Characterization of Membrane Transporter Function by In Silico Modeling and Simulation.

Authors:  J V Vermaas; N Trebesch; C G Mayne; S Thangapandian; M Shekhar; P Mahinthichaichan; J L Baylon; T Jiang; Y Wang; M P Muller; E Shinn; Z Zhao; P-C Wen; E Tajkhorshid
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 1.600

5.  Deficiencies in Molecular Dynamics Simulation-Based Prediction of Protein-DNA Binding Free Energy Landscapes.

Authors:  Morteza Khabiri; Peter L Freddolino
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Concerted Rolling and Penetration of Peptides during Membrane Binding.

Authors:  Jacob M Remington; Jonathon B Ferrell; Severin T Schneebeli; Jianing Li
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 6.578

7.  Large scale relative protein ligand binding affinities using non-equilibrium alchemy.

Authors:  Vytautas Gapsys; Laura Pérez-Benito; Matteo Aldeghi; Daniel Seeliger; Herman van Vlijmen; Gary Tresadern; Bert L de Groot
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 9.825

8.  Quantitative assessment of protein interaction with methyl-lysine analogues by hybrid computational and experimental approaches.

Authors:  Daniel Seeliger; Szabolcs Soeroes; Rebecca Klingberg; Dirk Schwarzer; Helmut Grubmüller; Wolfgang Fischle
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 5.100

9.  Towards computational specificity screening of DNA-binding proteins.

Authors:  Daniel Seeliger; Floris P Buelens; Maik Goette; Bert L de Groot; Helmut Grubmüller
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  A Benchmark of Electrostatic Method Performance in Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Yunhui Ge; David F Hahn; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.