Literature DB >> 18677040

Sensitivity of different dose scoring methods on organ-specific neutron dose calculations in proton therapy.

Christina Zacharatou Jarlskog1, Harald Paganetti.   

Abstract

Scattered doses, e.g. neutron doses in proton therapy, are of concern in radiation therapy. Although measured data are the gold standard, Monte Carlo simulations allow a more realistic consideration of patient anatomy via whole-body phantoms. When calculating neutron doses with Monte Carlo techniques, the dose can be scored in different ways because neutrons deposit dose indirectly. The purpose of this study was to assess the differences in neutron dose predictions when using different dose scoring methods. Two methods were tested. In the first method, the organ dose was calculated by accumulating dose from each individual dose deposition event with a particle-specific radiation weighting factor applied. Alternatively, we applied a method where the calculation was done by averaging the dose over the total number of events irrespective of particle type and applying average neutron radiation weighting factors. In addition, we assessed the sensitivity of different neutron quality factor assignments based on two recommendations by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). We found that the scoring procedure can lead to differences in the organ equivalent dose of about 25%. As to the ICRP definition of neutron quality factors, the most recent recommendation results in about 10% higher organ doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18677040     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/17/004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  6 in total

1.  TOPAS: an innovative proton Monte Carlo platform for research and clinical applications.

Authors:  J Perl; J Shin; J Schumann; B Faddegon; H Paganetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Proton therapy for the treatment of children with CNS malignancies.

Authors:  Radhika Sreeraman; Daniel J Indelicato
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2014-03

3.  Benchmark measurements and simulations of dose perturbations due to metallic spheres in proton beams.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Laura Rechner; Dragan Mirkovic; Pablo Yepes; Nicholas C Koch; Uwe Titt; Jonas D Fontenot; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 1.898

4.  Monte Carlo study of the potential reduction in out-of-field dose using a patient-specific aperture in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  Stephen J Dowdell; Benjamin Clasie; Nicolas Depauw; Peter Metcalfe; Anatoly B Rosenfeld; Hanne M Kooy; Jacob B Flanz; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Neutron Radiation Dose Measurements in a Scanning Proton Therapy Room: Can Parents Remain Near Their Children During Treatment?

Authors:  Vladimir Mares; Jad Farah; Marijke De Saint-Hubert; Szymon Domański; Carles Domingo; Martin Dommert; Magdalena Kłodowska; Katarzyna Krzempek; Michał Kuć; Immaculada Martínez-Rovira; Edyta Michaś; Natalia Mojżeszek; Łukasz Murawski; Ondrej Ploc; Maite Romero-Expósito; Marco Tisi; François Trompier; Olivier Van Hoey; Laurent Van Ryckeghem; Marek Wielunski; Roger M Harrison; Liliana Stolarczyk; Pawel Olko
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  Secondary neutron dose measurement for proton eye treatment using an eye snout with a borated neutron absorber.

Authors:  Dong Wook Kim; Weon Kuu Chung; Jungwook Shin; Young Kyung Lim; Dongho Shin; Se Byeong Lee; Myongguen Yoon; Sung-Yong Park; Dong Oh Shin; Jung Keun Cho
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.481

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.