Literature DB >> 18676760

Motexafin lutetium-photodynamic therapy of prostate cancer: short- and long-term effects on prostate-specific antigen.

Hiral Patel1, Rosemarie Mick, Jarod Finlay, Timothy C Zhu, Elizabeth Rickter, Keith A Cengel, S Bruce Malkowicz, Stephen M Hahn, Theresa M Busch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The time course of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response to photodynamic therapy (PDT) of prostate cancer was measured. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Seventeen patients were treated in a phase I trial of motexafin lutetium-PDT. PDT dose was calculated in each patient as the product of the ex vivo measured pre-PDT photosensitizer level and the in situ measured light dose. Serum PSA level was measured within 2 months before PDT (baseline), and at day 1; weeks 1 to 3; months 1, 2, and 3; months 4 to 6; and months 7 to 11 after PDT.
RESULTS: At 24 hours after PDT, serum PSA increased by 98% +/- 36% (mean +/- SE) relative to baseline levels (P = 0.007). When patients were dichotomized based on median PDT dose, those who received high PDT dose showed a 119% +/- 52% increase in PSA compared with a 54% +/- 27% increase in patients treated at low PDT dose. Patients treated with high versus low PDT dose showed a median biochemical delay of 82 versus 43 days (P = 0.024), with biochemical delay defined as the length of time between PDT and a nonreversible increase in PSA to a value greater than or equal to baseline.
CONCLUSIONS: Results show PDT to induce large, transient increases in serum PSA levels. Patients who experienced high PDT dose showed greater short-term increase in PSA and a significantly more durable PSA response (biochemical delay). These data strongly promote the need for individualized delivery of PDT dose and assessment of treatment effect in PDT of prostate cancer. Information gained from such patient-specific measurements could facilitate the introduction of multiple PDT sessions in patients who would benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18676760      PMCID: PMC2680073          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  36 in total

1.  Photodynamic therapy for prostate cancer: One urologist's perspective.

Authors:  Steven H Selman
Journal:  Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 3.631

2.  Treatment options after failure of radiation therapy-a review.

Authors:  Daniel B Rukstalis
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2002

3.  Optical properties of human prostate at 732 nm measured in mediated photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Timothy C Zhu; Andreea Dimofte; Jarod C Finlay; Diana Stripp; Theresa Busch; Jeremy Miles; Richard Whittington; S Bruce Malkowicz; Zelig Tochner; Eli Glatstein; Stephen M Hahn
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.421

4.  Determination of the distribution of light, optical properties, drug concentration, and tissue oxygenation in-vivo in human prostate during motexafin lutetium-mediated photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Timothy C Zhu; Jarod C Finlay; Stephen M Hahn
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 6.252

Review 5.  A guide to the interpretation of serum prostate specific antigen levels.

Authors:  P S Bunting
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.281

6.  Monitoring photodynamic therapy of solid tumors online by BOLD-contrast MRI.

Authors:  Shimon Gross; Assaf Gilead; Avigdor Scherz; Michal Neeman; Yoram Salomon
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2003-09-21       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  Photodynamic therapy for prostate cancer recurrence after radiotherapy: a phase I study.

Authors:  Timothy R Nathan; Douglas E Whitelaw; Stanley C Chang; William R Lees; Paul M Ripley; Heather Payne; Linda Jones; M Constance Parkinson; Mark Emberton; Alison R Gillams; Anthony R Mundy; Stephen G Bown
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Photodynamic therapy of established prostatic adenocarcinoma with TOOKAD: a biphasic apparent diffusion coefficient change as potential early MRI response marker.

Authors:  Vicki Plaks; Natalia Koudinova; Uri Nevo; Jehonathan H Pinthus; Hannah Kanety; Zelig Eshhar; Jacob Ramon; Avigdor Scherz; Michal Neeman; Yoram Salomon
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.715

9.  Prostate gland: MR imaging appearance after vascular targeted photodynamic therapy with palladium-bacteriopheophorbide.

Authors:  Masoom A Haider; Sean R H Davidson; Ashwini V Kale; Robert A Weersink; Andrew J Evans; Ants Toi; Mark R Gertner; Arjen Bogaards; Brian C Wilson; Joseph L Chin; Mostafa Elhilali; John Trachtenberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  In vivo optical characterization of human prostate tissue using near-infrared time-resolved spectroscopy.

Authors:  Tomas Svensson; Stefan Andersson-Engels; Margrét Einarsdóttír; Katarina Svanberg
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.170

View more
  34 in total

1.  Prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted photodynamic therapy induces rapid cytoskeletal disruption.

Authors:  Tiancheng Liu; Lisa Y Wu; Clifford E Berkman
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 2.  Photodynamic therapy for focal ablation of the prostate.

Authors:  Nimalan Arumainayagam; C M Moore; Hashim U Ahmed; M Emberton
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Increasing damage to tumor blood vessels during motexafin lutetium-PDT through use of low fluence rate.

Authors:  Theresa M Busch; Hsing-Wen Wang; E Paul Wileyto; Guoqiang Yu; Ralph M Bunte
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 4.  Photodynamic therapy for prostate cancer--a review of current status and future promise.

Authors:  Caroline M Moore; Doug Pendse; Mark Emberton
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol       Date:  2009-01

5.  Stability enhanced polyelectrolyte-coated gold nanorod-photosensitizer complexes for high/low power density photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Zhenzhi Shi; Wenzhi Ren; An Gong; Xinmei Zhao; Yuehong Zou; Eric Michael Bratsolias Brown; Xiaoyuan Chen; Aiguo Wu
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 6.  Texaphyrins: tumor localizing redox active expanded porphyrins.

Authors:  Jonathan F Arambula; Christian Preihs; Derric Borthwick; Darren Magda; Jonathan L Sessler
Journal:  Anticancer Agents Med Chem       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.505

7.  New Monte Carlo model of cylindrical diffusing fibers illustrates axially heterogeneous fluorescence detection: simulation and experimental validation.

Authors:  Timothy M Baran; Thomas H Foster
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.170

8.  Cylindrical diffuser axial detection profile is dependent on fiber design.

Authors:  Timothy M Baran
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.170

9.  A heterogeneous optimization algorithm for reacted singlet oxygen for interstitial PDT.

Authors:  Timothy C Zhu; Martin D Altschuler; Yida Hu; Ken Wang; Jarod C Finlay; Andreea Dimofte; Keith Cengel; Stephen M Hahn
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2010-01

10.  A heterogeneous algorithm for PDT dose optimization for prostate.

Authors:  Martin D Altschuler; Timothy C Zhu; Yida Hu; Jarod C Finlay; Andreea Dimofte; Ken Wang; Jun Li; Keith Cengel; S B Malkowicz; Stephen M Hahn
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2009-02-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.