Literature DB >> 18676631

Segmentation error in Stratus optical coherence tomography for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Praveen J Patel1, Fred K Chen, Lyndon da Cruz, Adnan Tufail.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the rate of automated segmentation error in Stratus optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans in consecutive patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) receiving treatment and to investigate the effect of the segmentation error on automated retinal thickness measures and whether further imaging reduces the rate of segmentation error.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of fast macular thickness map (FMTM) protocol OCT scans of 50 eyes of 50 consecutive patients with nAMD. Each line scan was analyzed for segmentation error with manual measurement of the center-point retinal thickness allowing calculation of the percentage error in automated thickness. OCT scanning was repeated to overcome segmentation error.
RESULTS: Segmentation error was detected in 45 (90%) of the 50 patients with 37 (74%) patients having an error affecting the central 1-mm subfield. Scan sets with a high central segmentation error score (two or more line scans affected of six) had a significantly greater error in automated center-point retinal thickness than scan sets with a low error score (20% compared with 3%, P < 0.000005). Central subfield segmentation error persisted in 30 (60%) patients despite repeat scanning.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a high rate of segmentation error in OCT scans of patients with nAMD who are undergoing treatment, leading to errors in automated central retinal thickness measurement. The authors recommend manual measurement of central macular thickness when two or more line scans are affected by segmentation error in the central 1-mm subfield. Repeated scanning reduced the rate of error but did not eliminate the problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18676631     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-1697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  19 in total

Review 1.  Optical coherence tomography: history, current status, and laboratory work.

Authors:  Michelle L Gabriele; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Larry Kagemann; Juan Xu; Lindsey S Folio; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Clinical assessment of mirror artifacts in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Joseph Ho; Dinorah P E Castro; Leonardo C Castro; Yueli Chen; Jonathan Liu; Cynthia Mattox; Chandrasekharan Krishnan; James G Fujimoto; Joel S Schuman; Jay S Duker
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Artifacts in optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Jay Chhablani; Tandava Krishnan; Vaibhav Sethi; Igor Kozak
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04

4.  Effect of OCT volume scan density on thickness measurements in diabetic macular edema.

Authors:  M G Nittala; R Konduru; H Ruiz-Garcia; S R Sadda
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 5.  Three dimensional optical coherence tomography imaging: advantages and advances.

Authors:  Michelle L Gabriele; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Juan Xu; Jongsick Kim; Larry Kagemann; Lindsey S Folio; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 21.198

6.  Inner retinal layer change in glaucoma patients receiving anti-VEGF for neovascular age related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Rafidah Saleh; Aashraya Karpe; Martin S Zinkernagel; Marion R Munk
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Cirrus OCT versus Spectralis OCT: differences in segmentation in fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment.

Authors:  Eva Smretschnig; Ilse Krebs; Sarah Moussa; Siamak Ansari-Shahrezaei; Siamak Ansari-Shahrezarei; Susanne Binder
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Assessment of artifacts and reproducibility across spectral- and time-domain optical coherence tomography devices.

Authors:  Joseph Ho; Alan C Sull; Laurel N Vuong; Yueli Chen; Jonathan Liu; James G Fujimoto; Joel S Schuman; Jay S Duker
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Predicting visual outcomes for macular disease using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Pearse A Keane; Srinivas R Sadda
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-26

10.  Impact of scanning density on measurements from spectral domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Srinivas R Sadda; Pearse A Keane; Yanling Ouyang; Jared F Updike; Alexander C Walsh
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.