BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is associated with increased prevalence of echocardiographic LV hypertrophy (LVH), a potent predictor of cardiovascular (CV) outcome. Whether MetS increases risk of CV events independently of presence of LVH has never been investigated. It is also unclear whether LVH predicts CV risk both in the presence and absence of MetS. METHODS AND RESULTS: Participants in the 2nd Strong Heart Study examination without prevalent coronary heart disease, congestive heart failure or renal insufficiency (plasma creatinine >2.5mg/dL) were studied (n=2758; 1746 women). MetS was defined by WHO criteria. Echocardiographic LV hypertrophy was defined using population-specific cut-point value for LV mass index (>47.3g/m(2.7)). After controlling for age, sex, LDL-cholesterol, smoking, plasma creatinine, diabetes, hypertension and obesity, participants with MetS had greater probability of LVH than those without MetS (OR=1.55 [1.18-2.04], p<0.002). Adjusted hazard of composite fatal and non-fatal CV events was greater when LVH was present, in participants without (HR=2.03 [1.33-3.08]) or with MetS (HR=1.64 [1.31-2.04], both p<0.0001), with similar adjusted population attributable risk (12% and 14%). After adjustment for LVH, risk of incident CV events remained 1.47-fold greater in MetS (p<0.003), an effect, however, that was not confirmed when diabetic participants were excluded. CONCLUSION: LVH is a strong predictor of composite 8-year fatal and non-fatal CV events either in the presence or in the absence of MetS and accounts for a substantial portion of the high CV risk associated with MetS.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is associated with increased prevalence of echocardiographic LV hypertrophy (LVH), a potent predictor of cardiovascular (CV) outcome. Whether MetS increases risk of CV events independently of presence of LVH has never been investigated. It is also unclear whether LVH predicts CV risk both in the presence and absence of MetS. METHODS AND RESULTS:Participants in the 2nd Strong Heart Study examination without prevalent coronary heart disease, congestive heart failure or renal insufficiency (plasma creatinine >2.5mg/dL) were studied (n=2758; 1746 women). MetS was defined by WHO criteria. Echocardiographic LV hypertrophy was defined using population-specific cut-point value for LV mass index (>47.3g/m(2.7)). After controlling for age, sex, LDL-cholesterol, smoking, plasma creatinine, diabetes, hypertension and obesity, participants with MetS had greater probability of LVH than those without MetS (OR=1.55 [1.18-2.04], p<0.002). Adjusted hazard of composite fatal and non-fatal CV events was greater when LVH was present, in participants without (HR=2.03 [1.33-3.08]) or with MetS (HR=1.64 [1.31-2.04], both p<0.0001), with similar adjusted population attributable risk (12% and 14%). After adjustment for LVH, risk of incident CV events remained 1.47-fold greater in MetS (p<0.003), an effect, however, that was not confirmed when diabeticparticipants were excluded. CONCLUSION: LVH is a strong predictor of composite 8-year fatal and non-fatal CV events either in the presence or in the absence of MetS and accounts for a substantial portion of the high CV risk associated with MetS.
Authors: B Dahlöf; R Devereux; U de Faire; F Fyhrquist; T Hedner; H Ibsen; S Julius; S Kjeldsen; K Kristianson; O Lederballe-Pedersen; L H Lindholm; M S Nieminen; P Omvik; S Oparil; H Wedel Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: R B Devereux; M J Roman; M Paranicas; M J O'Grady; E T Lee; T K Welty; R R Fabsitz; D Robbins; E R Rhoades; B V Howard Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-05-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: E T Lee; L D Cowan; T K Welty; M Sievers; W J Howard; A Oopik; W Wang; J Yeh; R B Devereux; E R Rhoades; R R Fabsitz; O Go; B V Howard Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1998-06-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: G de Simone; S R Daniels; R B Devereux; R A Meyer; M J Roman; O de Divitiis; M H Alderman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1992-11-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: T K Welty; E T Lee; J Yeh; L D Cowan; O Go; R R Fabsitz; N A Le; A J Oopik; D C Robbins; B V Howard Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1995-08-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: M Krššák; Y Winhofer; C Göbl; M Bischof; G Reiter; A Kautzky-Willer; A Luger; M Krebs; C Anderwald Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2011-04-15 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: G de Simone; D K Arnett; M Chinali; M De Marco; D C Rao; A T Kraja; S C Hunt; R B Devereux Journal: Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2011-05-12 Impact factor: 4.222
Authors: Alexandra Jichitu; Simona Bungau; Ana Maria Alexandra Stanescu; Cosmin Mihai Vesa; Mirela Marioara Toma; Cristiana Bustea; Stela Iurciuc; Marius Rus; Nicolae Bacalbasa; Camelia Cristina Diaconu Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2021-04-12
Authors: P M Seferović; I Milinković; A D Ristić; J P Seferović Mitrović; K Lalić; A Jotić; V Kanjuh; N Lalić; B Maisch Journal: Herz Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 1.443
Authors: Nir Ayalon; Deepa M Gopal; Deirdre M Mooney; Juliana S Simonetti; Jason R Grossman; Aeshita Dwivedi; Courtney Donohue; Alejandro J Perez; Jill Downing; Noyan Gokce; Edward J Miller; Chang-Seng Liang; Caroline M Apovian; Wilson S Colucci; Jennifer E Ho Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Fawn Yeh; Anne E Dixon; Lyle G Best; Susan M Marion; Elisa T Lee; Tauqeer Ali; Jeunliang Yeh; Everett R Rhoades; Barbara V Howard; Richard B Devereux Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2014-05-02 Impact factor: 2.778