Literature DB >> 18670591

Consequences of Base Time for Redundant Signals Experiments.

James T Townsend1, Christopher Honey.   

Abstract

We report analytical and computational investigations into the effects of base time on the diagnosticity of two popular theoretical tools in the redundant signals literature: (1) the race model inequality and (2) the capacity coefficient. We show analytically and without distributional assumptions that the presence of base time decreases the sensitivity of both of these measures to model violations. We further use simulations to investigate the statistical power model selection tools based on the race model inequality, both with and without base time. Base time decreases statistical power, and biases the race model test toward conservatism. The magnitude of this biasing effect increases as we increase the proportion of total reaction time variance contributed by base time. We marshal empirical evidence to suggest that the proportion of reaction time variance contributed by base time is relatively small, and that the effects of base time on the diagnosticity of our model-selection tools are therefore likely to be minor. However, uncertainty remains concerning the magnitude and even the definition of base time. Experimentalists should continue to be alert to situations in which base time may contribute a large proportion of the total reaction time variance.

Year:  2007        PMID: 18670591      PMCID: PMC2410145          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2007.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Psychol        ISSN: 0022-2496            Impact factor:   2.223


  35 in total

1.  Separate modifiability, mental modules, and the use of pure and composite measures to reveal them.

Authors:  S Sternberg
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2001-01

2.  Multiple bottlenecks in information processing? An electrophysiological examination.

Authors:  W Sommer; H Leuthold; T Schubert
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

3.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Francis Tuerlinckx
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

4.  Exaggerated redundancy gain in the split brain: a hemispheric coactivation account.

Authors:  Jeff Miller
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  A strong test of the dual-mode hypothesis.

Authors:  Erin M Ingvalson; Michael J Wenger
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-01

7.  Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times.

Authors:  D H RAAB
Journal:  Trans N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1962-03

8.  Binocular reaction times to contrast increments.

Authors:  D Westendorf; R Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Separate-activation models with variable base times: testability and checking of cross-channel dependency.

Authors:  R Ulrich; M Giray
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-04

10.  Varieties of perceptual independence.

Authors:  F G Ashby; J T Townsend
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  9 in total

1.  On quantifying multisensory interaction effects in reaction time and detection rate.

Authors:  Stefan Rach; Adele Diederich; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-05-29

2.  Converging measures of workload capacity.

Authors:  Ami Eidels; Chris Donkin; Scott D Brown; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-12

Review 3.  Workload capacity spaces: a unified methodology for response time measures of efficiency as workload is varied.

Authors:  James T Townsend; Ami Eidels
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-08

4.  Working memory's workload capacity.

Authors:  Andrew Heathcote; James R Coleman; Ami Eidels; Jason M Watson; Joseph Houpt; David L Strayer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-10

5.  Extending the simultaneous-sequential paradigm to measure perceptual capacity for features and words.

Authors:  Alec Scharff; John Palmer; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Comparing perception of Stroop stimuli in focused versus divided attention paradigms: evidence for dramatic processing differences.

Authors:  Ami Eidels; James T Townsend; Daniel Algom
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-09-05

7.  Statistical measures for workload capacity analysis.

Authors:  Joseph W Houpt; James T Townsend
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.223

8.  Compensating for age limits through emotional crossmodal integration.

Authors:  Laurence Chaby; Viviane Luherne-du Boullay; Mohamed Chetouani; Monique Plaza
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-27

9.  Developmental trends in the facilitation of multisensory objects with distractors.

Authors:  Harriet C Downing; Ayla Barutchu; Sheila G Crewther
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.