Literature DB >> 18670466

Direct costs of myopia in Singapore.

M C C Lim1, G Gazzard, E-L Sim, L Tong, S-M Saw.   

Abstract

AIMS: To estimate the direct costs of myopia in Singapore children.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 377 Singaporean school children aged 12-17 years from one school in Singapore Cohort study of the Risk factors for Myopia (SCORM) was conducted. A combination of parent and self-administered questionnaires asked about the cost of each optometrist visit, spectacles, and contact lenses, transport costs, father's educational level, and total family income.
RESULTS: A total of 377 subjects participated and cost data were available from 301 subjects. The mean annual direct cost of myopia was S$221.7+/-313.7 (CI, S$186.5-258.1) or US$147.8+/-209.1 (CI, US$124.3-172.1) and median annual direct cost of myopia was S$125.0 or US$83.3. The mean cost per pair of spectacles was S$123.2+/-61.2 (CI, S$116.6-129.8) or US$82.1+/-40.8 (CI, US$77.8-86.5). Sixty subjects (15.9%) wore contact lenses. The mean annual cost of contact lenses was S$567.1+/-565.7 (CI, S$422.2-712.0) or US$378.1+/-377.1 (CI, US$281.4-474.6). Subjects of families with higher total family income and those with fathers with secondary or higher education had higher annual direct expenditure (P=0.03 and P=0.001 respectively). Subjects from families with higher household incomes had higher frequency of change of spectacles (P=0.02) and shorter time since the last change of spectacles (P=0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: The mean annual direct cost of myopia for Singapore school children was S$221.68 (US$148) and the median, S$125.00 (US$83.33) per subject. Myopia is associated with significant financial burden in Singapore.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18670466     DOI: 10.1038/eye.2008.225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  27 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiology of myopia.

Authors:  P J Foster; Y Jiang
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  The measurement of time spent outdoors in child myopia research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Xian-Gui He; Xun Xu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Spectacle lenses designed to reduce progression of myopia: 12-month results.

Authors:  Padmaja Sankaridurg; Leslie Donovan; Saulius Varnas; Arthur Ho; Xiang Chen; Aldo Martinez; Scott Fisher; Zhi Lin; Earl L Smith; Jian Ge; Brien Holden
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 4.  [Epidemiology of myopia].

Authors:  S Hopf; N Pfeiffer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Effect of uncorrection versus full correction on myopia progression in 12-year-old children.

Authors:  Yun-Yun Sun; Shi-Ming Li; Si-Yuan Li; Meng-Tian Kang; Luo-Ru Liu; Bo Meng; Feng-Ju Zhang; Michel Millodot; Ningli Wang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 6.  [Secondary diseases in high myopia].

Authors:  F Ziemssen; W Lagrèze; B Voykov
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Refractive surgery: the most cost-saving technique in refractive errors correction.

Authors:  Seyed-Farzad Mohammadi; Cyrus Alinia; Maryam Tavakkoli; Alireza Lashay; Hormoz Chams
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  Influence of severity and types of astigmatism on visual acuity in school-aged children in southern China.

Authors:  Li-Li Wang; Wei Wang; Xiao-Tong Han; Ming-Guang He
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  Risk Factors of Myopic Shift among Primary School Children in Beijing, China: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Li-Juan Wu; You-Xin Wang; Qi-Sheng You; Jia-Li Duan; Yan-Xia Luo; Li-Juan Liu; Xia Li; Qi Gao; Hui-Ping Zhu; Yan He; Liang Xu; Man-Shu Song; Jost B Jonas; Xiu-Hua Guo; Wei Wang
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors: Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008-2011.

Authors:  Eun Chul Kim; Ian G Morgan; Hirohiko Kakizaki; Seungbum Kang; Donghyun Jee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.