Literature DB >> 18669534

Theta burst stimulation induces after-effects on contralateral primary motor cortex excitability in humans.

A Suppa1, E Ortu, N Zafar, F Deriu, W Paulus, A Berardelli, J C Rothwell.   

Abstract

Interhemispheric interactions between the primary motor cortices (M1) have been described with a variety of TMS methods. Here we give a detailed description of the interhemispheric interactions of a period of theta burst simulation (TBS), a rapid method of producing long lasting after-effects on the excitability of the stimulated M1. A total of 18 right handed healthy subjects participated. In most experiments, continuous and intermittent TBS (cTBS and iTBS) were delivered over the right M1 using a coil orientated to induce antero-posterior followed by postero-anterior (AP-PA) currents in the brain. The intensity of stimulation was 80% of active motor threshold (AMT), and a total of 600 pulses were applied. The effects on the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs), short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) were evaluated in the left and right M1 before and at three different times after TBS. We also tested long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) in right M1 and interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) from right to left M1. Finally, to explore the effect of different polarities of cTBS over dominant and non-dominant hemisphere we delivered AP-PA and postero-anterior followed by antero-posterior (PA-AP) cTBS over either right or left M1 and tested MEPs in both hemispheres. In the stimulated hemisphere, cTBS reduced MEPs and SICI whereas iTBS increased MEPs and SICI. In the non-stimulated hemisphere cTBS increased MEPs and reduced SICI, while iTBS reduced MEPs and increased SICI. There were no effects on ICF, LICI or IHI. Although both AP-PA cTBS and PA-AP cTBS reduced MEPs in the stimulated M1, the former increased MEPs from non-stimulated M1 whereas the latter did not. There was no difference in the effect of cTBS on the dominant or non-dominant hemisphere.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18669534      PMCID: PMC2614023          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.156596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  51 in total

1.  Organization of ipsilateral excitatory and inhibitory pathways in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Robert Chen; Derek Yung; Jie-Yuan Li
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-10-30       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Short-interval paired-pulse inhibition and facilitation of human motor cortex: the dimension of stimulus intensity.

Authors:  Tihomir V Ilić; Frank Meintzschel; Ulrich Cleff; Diane Ruge; Kirn R Kessler; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Interactions between inhibitory and excitatory circuits in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Robert Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Contribution of the ipsilateral motor cortex to recovery after chronic stroke.

Authors:  Konrad J Werhahn; Adriana B Conforto; Nadja Kadom; Mark Hallett; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 10.422

5.  Disinhibition of the contralateral motor cortex by low-frequency rTMS.

Authors:  Christian Plewnia; Martin Lotze; Christian Gerloff
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2003-03-24       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Subtle hemispheric asymmetry of motor cortical inhibitory tone.

Authors:  Tihomir V Ilic; Patrick Jung; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Effects on the right motor hand-area excitability produced by low-frequency rTMS over human contralateral homologous cortex.

Authors:  Francesca Gilio; Vincenzo Rizzo; Hartwig R Siebner; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-06-23       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Modulation of excitability of human motor cortex (M1) by 1 Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralateral M1.

Authors:  H M Schambra; L Sawaki; L G Cohen
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Interhemispheric effects of high and low frequency rTMS in healthy humans.

Authors:  A Gorsler; T Bäumer; C Weiller; A Münchau; J Liepert
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Crossed reduction of human motor cortex excitability by 1-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  E M Wassermann; F R Wedegaertner; U Ziemann; M S George; R Chen
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1998-07-10       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  43 in total

1.  Differential impact of continuous theta-burst stimulation over left and right DLPFC on planning.

Authors:  Christoph P Kaller; Katharina Heinze; Annekathrein Frenkel; Claus H Läppchen; Josef M Unterrainer; Cornelius Weiller; Rüdiger Lange; Benjamin Rahm
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Theta burst stimulation over the primary motor cortex does not induce cortical plasticity in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Carsten Eggers; Gereon R Fink; Dennis A Nowak
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Exploring the after-effects of theta burst magnetic stimulation on the human motor cortex: a functional imaging study.

Authors:  Lizbeth Cárdenas-Morales; Georg Grön; Thomas Kammer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  The effects of five sessions of continuous theta burst stimulation over contralesional sensorimotor cortex paired with paretic skilled motor practice in people with chronic stroke.

Authors:  J L Neva; K E Brown; K P Wadden; C S Mang; M R Borich; S K Meehan; L A Boyd
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 5.  Safety of theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Lindsay Oberman; Dylan Edwards; Mark Eldaief; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.177

6.  On-line effects of quadripulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (QPS) on the contralateral hemisphere studied with somatosensory evoked potentials and near infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Masaki Hirose; Hitoshi Mochizuki; Stefan Jun Groiss; Yumiko Tanji; Koichiro Nakamura; Setsu Nakatani-Enomoto; Hiroyuki Enomoto; Masatoyo Nishizawa; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Unravelling homeostatic interactions in inhibitory and excitatory networks in human motor cortex.

Authors:  Anke Karabanov; Hartwig Roman Siebner
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 8.  Can noninvasive brain stimulation enhance cognition in neuropsychiatric disorders?

Authors:  Asli Demirtas-Tatlidede; Andrew M Vahabzadeh-Hagh; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 5.250

9.  Impact of different intensities of intermittent theta burst stimulation on the cortical properties during TMS-EEG and working memory performance.

Authors:  Sung Wook Chung; Nigel C Rogasch; Kate E Hoy; Caley M Sullivan; Robin F H Cash; Paul B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 10.  Rehabilitating the addicted brain with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Marco Diana; Tommi Raij; Miriam Melis; Aapo Nummenmaa; Lorenzo Leggio; Antonello Bonci
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 34.870

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.