| Literature DB >> 18667071 |
Lilian Rose Pratt-Riccio1, Selma Sallenave-Sales, Joseli de Oliveira-Ferreira, Bruno T da Silva, Monick Lindenmeyer Guimarães, Fátima Santos, Thatiane S de Simone, Mariza G Morgado, Salvatore G de Simone, Maria de Fátima Ferreira-Da-Cruz, Cláudio T Daniel-Ribeiro, Mariano G Zalis, Daniel Camus, Dalma M Banic.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Plasmodium falciparum P126 protein is an asexual blood-stage malaria vaccine candidate antigen. Antibodies against P126 are able to inhibit parasite growth in vitro, and a major parasite-inhibitory epitope has been recently mapped to its 47 kDa N-terminal extremity (octamer repeat domain--OR domain). The OR domain basically consists of six octamer units, but variation in the sequence and number of repeat units may appear in different alleles. The aim of the present study was to investigate the polymorphism of P126 N-terminal region OR domain in P. falciparum isolates from two Brazilian malaria endemic areas and its impact on anti-OR naturally acquired antibodies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18667071 PMCID: PMC2515332 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-7-144
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Infection patterns of the Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Candeias do Jamari and Peixoto de Azevedo analysed by Nested PCR.
| n (%) | n (%) | |||
| Single infections1 | ||||
| I (175) | 3 (3%) | 4 (5%) | 27 (28%)a, b | |
| II (199) | 95 (92%) | 70 (90%) | 49 (51%)c, d | |
| Mixed infection2 | ||||
| I + II (175/199) | 5 (5%) | 4 (5%) | 20 (21%)e, f | |
| 103 (100%) | 78 (100%) | 96 (100%) | ||
1Isolates with one fragment; 2Isolates with two fragments; bp: base pair; n: number of isolates (the percentage of isolates is given in parentheses); a: P < 0.0001, PA > CJ-1993; b: P < 0.0001, PA > CJ-2002; c: P < 0.0001, PA < CJ-1993; d: P < 0.0001, PA < CJ-2002; e: P = 0.001, PA > CJ-1993; f: P = 0.003, PA > CJ-2002. The chi-square test was used to analyse the difference in allelic frequencies.
Figure 1Alignment of the predicted amino acid sequences of P126 OR region from Candeias do Jamari and Peixoto de Azevedo (GenBank accession number EU360815 and EU360816). The OR fragments OR-I and OR-II from Brazil were compared one each other and to FCR3 and Honduras1 OR described sequences reported by Morimatsu and others [22] and Liu and others [35]. The motif insertion is underlined, the lake of corresponding residues is indicated by dash, different residues are indicated in boldface letters and two (OR-I) or three (OR-II) antigenic determinants are in box.
Figure 2Comparison of the predictive regions of the OR domain. The two (OR-I) or three (OR-II) antigenic determinants are in box.
Prevalence of anti-OR antibody responses in Candeias do Jamari and Peixoto de Azevedo groups according to the infection patterns.
| Infection patterns | Candeias do Jamari (CJ) | Peixoto de Azevedo (PA) | |
| 1993 | 2002 | ||
| Single1 | |||
| | 3/3 | 3/4 | 21/25 (84) |
| | 52/69 (75) | 65/70 (93)a, b | 36/46 (78) |
| Mixed2 | 4/4 | 4/4 | 16/20 (80) |
1Isolates with one fragment; 2Isolates with two fragments. The data represent the number of responders/number of tested individuals (the percentage of responders is given in parentheses). a: P = 0.005, CJ-2002 OR-II > CJ-1993 OR-II; b: P = 0.04, CJ-2002 > PA OR-II; c: P = 0.01, CJ- 2002 > CJ-1993; d: P = 0.02, CJ- 2002 > PA. The Chi-square test was used to analyse the difference in prevalence of positive responses.
Prevalence and levels of antibodies to the OR domain of the P. falciparum P126 protein in Candeias do Jamari and Peixoto de Azevedo groups regardless of the infection patterns.
| 71/90 (79%) | 53/76 (70%) | 58/78 (74%) | n.s. | |
| 4.5 ± 2.8 | 4.9 ± 3.0 | 8.6 ± 8.3 | ||
| 49/90 (54%) | 43/68 (63%) | 63/78 (81%) | ||
| 2.3 ± 1.5 | 3.4 ± 2.0 | 4.9 ± 4.8 | ||
| 45/70 (64%) | 43/49 (87%) | 14/58 (24%) | ||
| 2.3 ± 2.0 | 3.2 ± 2.0 | 1.9 ± 0.7 | ||
| 5/70 (7%) | 7/49 (14%) | 21/58 (36%) | ||
| 1.3 ± 0.4 | 2.8 ± 2.8 | 1.3 ± 0.4 | n.s. | |
| 68/70 (97%) | 47/49 (96%) | 35/58 (60%) | ||
| 8.1 ± 6.4 | 10.2 ± 9.7 | 7.9 ± 6.1 | n.s. | |
| 30/70 (43%) | 23/49 (47%) | 24/58 (41%) | n.s. | |
| 1.3 ± 0.2 | 1.6 ± 0.7 | 2.5 ± 2.2 | n.s. |
The data represent the number of responders/number of tested individuals (the percentage of responders is given in parentheses) and the antibody levels expressed as mean of OD index ± SD. The Student's t-test was used to analyse the differences in mean values, the Chi-square test was used to analyse the difference in prevalence of positive responses.
Prevalence and levels of antibodies to the OR domain of the P. falciparum P126 protein in Candeias do Jamari and Peixoto de Azevedo groups according to the infection patterns.
| Candeias do Jamari (CJ) | ||||||
| | 47/69 (68) | 39/63 (62) | 39/44a | 6/44b | 42/44c | 19/44 (43) |
| | 55/70 (78) | 57/70g (81) | 13/55h (23) | 19/55i | 35/55 (60) | 23/55 (42) |
| Peixoto de Azevedo (PA) | ||||||
| 19/25 (76) | 13/25 (52) | 13/18l (72) | 0/18m | 18/18n (100) | 9/18 (50) | |
| 36/46 (78) | 27/46 (59) | 21/36o (58) | 5/36p (14) | 34/36q (94) | 16/36 (44) | |
| 16/19 (84) | 9/19 (47) | 11/16r(69) | 0/16s | 16/16 (100)t | 5/16 (31) | |
The data represent the number of responders/total of each fragment tested (the percentage of responders is given in parentheses) and the antibody levels expressed as mean of OD index ± SD. P < 0.05. a: CJ-1993- IgG1 > IgG2, IgG1 > IgG4; CJ-1993 IgG1 > CJ-2002 IgG1; b: CJ-1993- IgG2 < IgG3, IgG2 < IgG4; CJ-1993 IgG2 < CJ-2002 IgG2; c: CJ-1993- IgG3 > IgG4; CJ-1993 IgG3 > CJ-2002 IgG3; d: CJ-1993 IgG < CJ-2002 IgG; e: CJ-1993 IgG1 > CJ-2002 IgG1; f: CJ-1993 IgG4 < CJ-2002 IgG4; g: CJ-2002 IgM > CJ-1993 IgM, CJ-2002 IgM > PA IgM; h: CJ-2002 IgG1 < IgG3; i: CJ-2002 IgG2 < IgG3; CJ-2002 IgG2 > PA OR-II IgG2; j: CJ-2002 IgG > PA OR-II IgG; k: CJ-2002 IgG4 > PA OR-II IgG4 l: PA OR-I IgG1 > IgG2; PA OR-I IgG1 < IgG3; m: PA OR-I IgG2 < IgG3; PA OR-I IgG2 < IgG4; n: PA OR-I IgG3 > IgG4; o: PA OR-II IgG1 > IgG2; PA OR-II IgG1 < IgG3; p: PA OR-II IgG2 < IgG3; PA OR-II IgG2 < IgG4; q: PA OR-II IgG3 > IgG4; CJ-2002 IgG3 < PA OR-II IgG3; r: PA mixed IgG1 > IgG2; s: PA mixed IgG2 > IgG3; t: PA mixed IgG3 > IgG4. The Student's t-test was used to analyse the differences in mean values, the Chi-square test was used to analyse the difference in prevalence of positive responses.