Literature DB >> 18666496

Microleakage of all-ceramic crowns using self-etching resin luting agents.

Cynthia Paulina Trajtenberg1, Santiago J Caram, Sudarat Kiat-amnuay.   

Abstract

Self-etching adhesive systems are a new generation of materials that possess acidic methacrylates that can generate self-adhesion. There is limited data reported on the marginal leakage of ceramic restorations bonded with self-etching adhesive materials. This study assessed and compared the amount of microleakage of bonded ceramic crowns using three different types of self-etching adhesive systems with and without a die spacer. Eighteen human molars were prepared for all-ceramic IPS Empress crowns and the teeth were randomly assigned to each experimental group. The buccal side had the preparation finish line 1.5 mm below the CEJ, and the lingual finish line was 1.5 mm above the CEJ, creating margins in enamel and dentin. Two die-spacing techniques were used (three layers or no layer of die spacer). Each crown restoration was cemented with one of three self-etching resin luting agents (Panavia F 2.0, Multilink and RelyX Unicem). The specimens were thermally cycled for 1000 cycles, then immersed in a 5% methylene blue dye solution for 24 hours. The teeth were then rinsed, embedded in clear epoxy resin and sectioned. A total of 60 sections were evaluated for each type of resin luting agent using digital image analysis at 70x magnification. A novel formula, using mean percentage of microleakage, was developed by dividing the extent of dye penetration along the tooth/resin luting cement interphase and the total perimeter of the tooth crown surface. The data were analyzed using three-way analysis of variance at the 0.05 level of significance. Fisher's PLSD intervals were calculated for comparing significant means. Panavia F 2.0 showed a lower degree of microleakage than RelyX Unicem and Multilink at both the enamel and dentin margins. Interactions of the main effects (cement, margin and die spacer technique) were all highly significant (p< or =0.004). The degree of microleakage was higher on the dentin margins than on the enamel margins (p<0.0001). The degree of microleakage for the die spacer group was not significantly different from the group with no die spacer technique (p>0.1). Overall, Panavia F 2.0 showed the least microleakage, followed by RelyX Unicem and Multilink, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18666496     DOI: 10.2341/07-101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  10 in total

1.  Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays.

Authors:  Marleen Peumans; M Voet; J De Munck; K Van Landuyt; A Van Ende; B Van Meerbeek
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of Different Luting Cements and Tooth Preparation Angle on the Microleakage of Zirconia Crowns.

Authors:  Behnaz Ebadian; Amirhossein Fathi; Melika Savoj
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-08-06

3.  Fractographic and Microhardness Evaluation of All-Ceramic Hot-Pressed and CAD/CAM Restorations after Hydrothermal Aging.

Authors:  Roxana Diana Vasiliu; Ion-Dragoș Uțu; Lucian Rusu; Adrian Boloș; Liliana Porojan
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  Fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM resin composite molar crowns.

Authors:  Fatma A Shembish; Hui Tong; Marina Kaizer; Malvin N Janal; Van P Thompson; Niek J Opdam; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  Correlation between Microleakage and Absolute Marginal Discrepancy in Zirconia Crowns Cemented with Four Resin Luting Cements: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Abad-Coronel Cristian; Li Jeanette; Martínez-Rus Francisco; Pradíes Guillermo
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2016-09-18

6.  Evaluation of Fracture Resistance and Microleakage of Endocrowns with Different Intracoronal Depths and Restorative Materials Luted with Various Resin Cements.

Authors:  Ouqba Ghajghouj; Simge Taşar-Faruk
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 7.  Cement selection criteria for different types of intracanal posts.

Authors:  Safoura Ghodsi; Mohammad Mostafa Aghamohseni; Sarah Arzani; Sasan Rasaeipour; Mina Shekarian
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2022-07-18

Review 8.  Cementation of Glass-Ceramic Posterior Restorations: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carline R G van den Breemer; Marco M M Gresnigt; Marco S Cune
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-18       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Microleakage of Four Dental Cements in Metal Ceramic Restorations With Open Margins.

Authors:  Reza Eftekhar Ashtiani; Babak Farzaneh; Mohadese Azarsina; Farzad Aghdashi; Nima Dehghani; Aisooda Afshari; Minu Mahshid
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2015-11-01       Impact factor: 0.611

10.  Comparative clinical study of the marginal discrepancy of fixed dental prosthesis fabricated by the milling-sintering method using a presintered alloy.

Authors:  Mijoo Kim; Jaewon Kim; Hang-Nga Mai; Tae-Yub Kwon; Yong-Do Choi; Cheong-Hee Lee; Du-Hyeong Lee
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 1.904

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.