Literature DB >> 18665739

Change deafness and the organizational properties of sounds.

Melissa K Gregg1, Arthur G Samuel.   

Abstract

Change blindness, or the failure to detect (often large) changes to visual scenes, has been demonstrated in a variety of different situations. Failures to detect auditory changes are far less studied, and thus little is known about the nature of change deafness. Five experiments were conducted to explore the processes involved in change deafness by measuring explicit change detection as well as auditory object encoding. The experiments revealed that considerable change deafness occurs, even though auditory objects are encoded quite well. Familiarity with the objects did not affect detection or recognition performance. Whereas spatial location was not an effective cue, fundamental frequency and the periodicity/aperiodicity of the sounds provided important cues for the change-detection task. Implications for the mechanisms responsible for change deafness and auditory sound organization are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18665739     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.4.974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  15 in total

1.  Fundamental differences in change detection between vision and audition.

Authors:  Laurent Demany; Catherine Semal; Jean-René Cazalets; Daniel Pressnitzer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Feature assignment in perception of auditory figure.

Authors:  Melissa K Gregg; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Context-dependent role of selective attention for change detection in multi-speaker scenes.

Authors:  Christian Starzynski; Alexander Gutschalk
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  How lexical is the lexicon? Evidence for integrated auditory memory representations.

Authors:  April Pufahl; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Change detection in complex auditory scenes is predicted by auditory memory, pitch perception, and years of musical training.

Authors:  Christina M Vanden Bosch der Nederlanden; Che'Renee Zaragoza; Angie Rubio-Garcia; Evan Clarkson; Joel S Snyder
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-17

6.  Change deafness can be reduced, but not eliminated, using brief training interventions.

Authors:  Vanessa C Irsik; Joel S Snyder
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-09-06

7.  Tactile temporal offset cues reduce visual representational momentum.

Authors:  Simon Merz; Christian Frings; Charles Spence
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Detection of appearing and disappearing objects in complex acoustic scenes.

Authors:  Francisco Cervantes Constantino; Leyla Pinggera; Supathum Paranamana; Makio Kashino; Maria Chait
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Processing of indexical information requires time: Evidence from change deafness.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Alexander Donoso
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Attention, awareness, and the perception of auditory scenes.

Authors:  Joel S Snyder; Melissa K Gregg; David M Weintraub; Claude Alain
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-02-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.