STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of patients with radicular low back pain who present to an emergency department (ED) within 1 week of pain onset. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that a single intramuscular 160 mg dose of methylprednisolone acetate would improve pain and functional outcomes 1 month after ED discharge if the corticosteroid were administered early in disease symptomotology. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Parenteral corticosteroids are not recommended for acute, radicular low back pain, though their role in this disease process is ill-defined. To date, this medication class has only been studied in a highly selected group of patients requiring hospitalization. METHODS.: Adults between the ages of 21 and 50 who presented to an ED with low back pain and a positive straight leg raise test were enrolled. The primary outcome was change in pain intensity on an 11 point numerical rating scale 1 month after ED visit. Secondary outcomes 1 month after ED discharge included analgesic use, functional disability, and adverse medication effects. RESULTS:Six hundred thirty-seven patients were approached for participation, 133 were eligible, and 82 were randomized. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. The primary outcome, a comparison of the mean improvement in pain intensity, favored methylprednisolone by 1.3 (P = 0.10). Some secondary outcomes favored methylprednisolone, such as use of analgesic medication within the previous 24 hours (22% vs. 43%, 95% CI for difference of 20%: 0%-40%) and functional disability (19% vs. 49%, 95% CI for difference of 29%: 9%-49%). Adverse medication effects 1 week after ED discharge were reported by 32% of methylprednisolone and 24% of placebo patients (95% CI for difference of 9%: -12% to 30%). CONCLUSION: This study was a negative study, though there was a suggestion of benefit of methylprednisolone acetate in a population of young adults with acute radicular low back pain. Further work with a larger sample of patients is needed.
RCT Entities:
STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of patients with radicular low back pain who present to an emergency department (ED) within 1 week of pain onset. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that a single intramuscular 160 mg dose of methylprednisolone acetate would improve pain and functional outcomes 1 month after ED discharge if the corticosteroid were administered early in disease symptomotology. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Parenteral corticosteroids are not recommended for acute, radicular low back pain, though their role in this disease process is ill-defined. To date, this medication class has only been studied in a highly selected group of patients requiring hospitalization. METHODS.: Adults between the ages of 21 and 50 who presented to an ED with low back pain and a positive straight leg raise test were enrolled. The primary outcome was change in pain intensity on an 11 point numerical rating scale 1 month after ED visit. Secondary outcomes 1 month after ED discharge included analgesic use, functional disability, and adverse medication effects. RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-seven patients were approached for participation, 133 were eligible, and 82 were randomized. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. The primary outcome, a comparison of the mean improvement in pain intensity, favored methylprednisolone by 1.3 (P = 0.10). Some secondary outcomes favored methylprednisolone, such as use of analgesic medication within the previous 24 hours (22% vs. 43%, 95% CI for difference of 20%: 0%-40%) and functional disability (19% vs. 49%, 95% CI for difference of 29%: 9%-49%). Adverse medication effects 1 week after ED discharge were reported by 32% of methylprednisolone and 24% of placebo patients (95% CI for difference of 9%: -12% to 30%). CONCLUSION: This study was a negative study, though there was a suggestion of benefit of methylprednisolone acetate in a population of young adults with acute radicular low back pain. Further work with a larger sample of patients is needed.
Authors: Nicole van der Roer; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Geertruida E Bekkering; Maurits W van Tulder; Henrica C W de Vet Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2006-03-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Axel Finckh; Pascal Zufferey; Marc-André Schurch; Federico Balagué; Maurice Waldburger; Alexander K L So Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2006-02-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Harley Goldberg; William Firtch; Mark Tyburski; Alice Pressman; Lynn Ackerson; Luisa Hamilton; Wayne Smith; Ryan Carver; Annu Maratukulam; Lawrence A Won; Eugene Carragee; Andrew L Avins Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-05-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Roger Chou; Rafael Zambelli Pinto; Rongwei Fu; Robert A Lowe; Nicholas Henschke; James H McAuley; Tracy Dana Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2022-10-21
Authors: Benjamin W Friedman; Eddie Irizarry; Clemencia Solorzano; Nauman Khankel; Jennifer Zapata; Eleftheria Zias; E John Gallagher Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2017-02-07 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Thomas M de Bruijn; Ingrid B de Groot; Harald S Miedema; Johan Haumann; Raymond W J G Ostelo Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: Rafael Zambelli Pinto; Chris G Maher; Manuela L Ferreira; Paulo H Ferreira; Mark Hancock; Vinicius C Oliveira; Andrew J McLachlan; Bart Koes Journal: BMJ Date: 2012-02-13