Literature DB >> 8604867

Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity.

K H Todd1, K G Funk, J P Funk, R Bonacci.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine the amount of change in pain severity, as measured by a visual analog scale, that constitutes a minimum clinically significant difference.
METHODS: Patients 18 years of age or older who presented with acute pain resulting from trauma were enrolled in this prospective, descriptive study. The setting was an urban county hospital emergency department with a Level 1 trauma center. In the course of a brief interview, patients were asked to indicate their current pain severity with a single mark through a standard 100-mm visual analog scale. At intervals of 20 minutes for the next 2 hours, patients were asked to repeat this measurement and, in addition, to contrast their present pain severity with that at the time of the previous measurement. They were to indicate whether they had "much less," "a little less," "about the same," "a little more," or "much more" pain. All contrasts were made without reference to prior visual analog scale measurements. A maximum of six measurements of pain change were recorded per patient. Measurements ended when the patient left the ED or when the patient reported a pain score of zero. The minimum clinically significant change in visual analog scale pain score was defined as the mean difference between current and preceding visual analog scale scores when the subject noted a little less or a little more pain.
RESULTS: Forty-eight subjects were enrolled, and 248 pain contrasts were recorded. Of these contrasts, 41 were rated as a little less and 39 as a little more pain. The mean difference between current and preceding visual analog scale scores in these 80 contrasts was 13 mm (95% confidence interval, 10 to 17 mm).
CONCLUSION: The minimum clinically significant change in patient pain severity measured with a 100-mm visual analog scale was 13 mm. Studies of pain experience that report less than a 13-mm change in pain severity, although statistically significant, may have no clinical importance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8604867     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70238-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  194 in total

1.  A comparison of topical menthol to ice on pain, evoked tetanic and voluntary force during delayed onset muscle soreness.

Authors:  Pramod Johar; Varun Grover; Robert Topp; David G Behm
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-06

2.  Strength-training protocols to improve deficits in participants with chronic ankle instability: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Emily A Hall; Carrie L Docherty; Janet Simon; Jackie J Kingma; Joanne C Klossner
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Efficacy of intraperitoneal local anaesthetic techniques during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  K J Roberts; J Gilmour; R Pande; P Nightingale; L C Tan; S Khan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Efficacy of surgery for rotator cuff tendinopathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Panagiota Toliopoulos; François Desmeules; Jennifer Boudreault; Jean-Sébastien Roy; Pierre Frémont; Joy C MacDermid; Clermont E Dionne
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  The effect of CYP2D6 drug-drug interactions on hydrocodone effectiveness.

Authors:  Andrew A Monte; Kennon J Heard; Jenny Campbell; D Hamamura; Richard M Weinshilboum; Vasilis Vasiliou
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  Comment with regard to: Outcomes of a prospective cohort study on peri-radicular infiltration for radicular pain in patients with lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis (L. Ng et al.).

Authors:  Charles Pither
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Percutaneous regional compared with local anaesthesia for facial lacerations: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  V Tarsia; A J Singer; G A Cassara; M T Hein
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Entonox as an analgesic agent during panretinal photocoagulation.

Authors:  H L Cook; R S B Newsom; E Mensah; M Saeed; D James; T J Ffytche
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  The Reliability of Remembered Pretreatment Visual Analog Scale Scores among Hand-Surgery Patients.

Authors:  Vilhjalmur Finsen; Sigrun Hillesund; Ida Fromreide
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2019-04-17

10.  A randomized placebo-controlled trial of single-dose IM corticosteroid for radicular low back pain.

Authors:  Benjamin W Friedman; David Esses; Clemencia Solorzano; Hong K Choi; Michael Cole; Michelle Davitt; Polly E Bijur; E J Gallagher
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.