OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence of cervical stenosis and related emotional and sexual adjustment concerns in women treated with radical trachelectomy. METHODS: Prospective data of 30 stage I cervical cancer patients enrolled in an ongoing study were evaluated in combination with a medical chart review. RESULTS: Eight patients (27%) did not have any stenosis of the neo-cervix postoperatively; 10 (33%) had clinically notable stenosis not requiring neo-cervical dilation to allow adequate sampling; moreover, 12 (40%) had sufficient stenosis requiring a neo-cervical dilation procedure, which proved to be safe and useful. The majority of the dilation procedures (n=8) were conducted under local anesthesia in the office. At preoperative baseline survey, women reported a high rate of sexual inactivity. Fear of intercourse and dyspareunia were reported prior to surgery; however, trends of adjustment and improvement were noted over time postoperatively. Overall, fear of sexual activity tended to lessen if the degree of dyspareunia decreased over time. Postoperative dyspareunia decreased over time, which could have been associated with the mechanical stretching due to vaginal dilator use or dilating benefit of intercourse. CONCLUSION: Postoperative concerns associated with radical trachelectomy may be greater than what has been reported in the literature; however, several adjustment trends were noted with intermediate/long-term follow-up. Office cervical dilation is a simple procedure, which is helpful in the management of neo-cervical stenosis. We are currently investigating the value of a physician checklist as a clinical care model to remind medical professionals to monitor and address important survivorship issues.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence of cervical stenosis and related emotional and sexual adjustment concerns in women treated with radical trachelectomy. METHODS: Prospective data of 30 stage I cervical cancerpatients enrolled in an ongoing study were evaluated in combination with a medical chart review. RESULTS: Eight patients (27%) did not have any stenosis of the neo-cervix postoperatively; 10 (33%) had clinically notable stenosis not requiring neo-cervical dilation to allow adequate sampling; moreover, 12 (40%) had sufficient stenosis requiring a neo-cervical dilation procedure, which proved to be safe and useful. The majority of the dilation procedures (n=8) were conducted under local anesthesia in the office. At preoperative baseline survey, women reported a high rate of sexual inactivity. Fear of intercourse and dyspareunia were reported prior to surgery; however, trends of adjustment and improvement were noted over time postoperatively. Overall, fear of sexual activity tended to lessen if the degree of dyspareunia decreased over time. Postoperative dyspareunia decreased over time, which could have been associated with the mechanical stretching due to vaginal dilator use or dilating benefit of intercourse. CONCLUSION: Postoperative concerns associated with radical trachelectomy may be greater than what has been reported in the literature; however, several adjustment trends were noted with intermediate/long-term follow-up. Office cervical dilation is a simple procedure, which is helpful in the management of neo-cervical stenosis. We are currently investigating the value of a physician checklist as a clinical care model to remind medical professionals to monitor and address important survivorship issues.
Authors: Diana D Jeffery; Lisa Barbera; Barbara L Andersen; Amy K Siston; Anuja Jhingran; Shirley R Baron; Jennifer Barsky Reese; Deborah J Coady; Jeanne Carter; Kathryn E Flynn Journal: J Psychosoc Oncol Date: 2015
Authors: N D Fleming; P T Ramirez; P T Soliman; K M Schmeler; G B Chisholm; A M Nick; S N Westin; M Frumovitz Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2016-10-11 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Jeanne Carter; Yukio Sonoda; Raymond E Baser; Leigh Raviv; Dennis S Chi; Richard R Barakat; Alexia Iasonos; Carol L Brown; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Emily K Hill; Stacey Sandbo; Emily Abramsohn; Jennifer Makelarski; Kristen Wroblewski; Emily R Wenrich; Stacy McCoy; Sarah M Temkin; S Diane Yamada; Stacy T Lindau Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-12-23 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Marianne K Thygesen; Birthe D Pedersen; Jakob Kragstrup; Lis Wagner; Ole Mogensen Journal: Int J Integr Care Date: 2011-10-07 Impact factor: 5.120
Authors: Christina M Wilson; Deborah B McGuire; Beth L Rodgers; R K Elswick; Sarah M Temkin Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2021 Sep-Oct 01 Impact factor: 2.592