Literature DB >> 27742473

Quality of life after radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A 5-year prospective evaluation.

N D Fleming1, P T Ramirez2, P T Soliman2, K M Schmeler2, G B Chisholm2, A M Nick2, S N Westin2, M Frumovitz2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To longitudinally assess quality of life (QOL) in women undergoing radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.
METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients with stage IA1-IB1 cervical cancer prior to undergoing radical trachelectomy to complete validated QOL instruments. These instruments included the General Health-Related QOL (SF-12), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cervix (FACT-Cx), MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI), Female Sexual Functioning Index (FSFI), and Satisfaction with Decision scale (SWD). Instruments were filled out at baseline, postoperatively at 6weeks, 6months, 1year, and annually thereafter for 4years.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients enrolled in the study, and 32 patients were evaluable. The scores for FSFI-arousal (p=0.0002), lubrication (p<0.0001), orgasm (p=0.006), pain (p=0.01), satisfaction (p=0.03) and total score (p=0.004) showed a significant decline at 6weeks then returned to baseline levels by 6 months. The scores for FACT-Cx functional well-being (p=0.02) and physical well-being (p<0.0001), SF-12 bodily pain (p<0.0001), physical functioning (p<0.0001), role physical (p<0.0001), role emotional (p=0.03), social functioning (p=0.002), and MDASI total (p=0.04) showed significantly worsened symptoms at 6weeks then returned to baseline by 6months. The scores for FACT-Cx emotional well-being showed significant worsening of symptoms that persisted at 6-weeks (p=0.004), 6months (p=0.007), 1year (p=0.001), 2years (p=0.002), and 4 years (p=0.03). There was no difference in SWD.
CONCLUSIONS: Several quality of life assessments decline immediately postoperatively after radical trachelectomy, however, return to baseline thereafter. The long-term emotional impact of this surgery highlights a need for perioperative counseling in these patients.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Quality of life; Trachelectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27742473      PMCID: PMC5439265          DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  27 in total

1.  Quality of life, urogynecological morbidity, and lymphedema after radical vaginal trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Ligita Paskeviciute Frøding; Christian Ottosen; Berit Jul Mosgaard; Pernille Tine Jensen
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.437

2.  A 2-year prospective study assessing the emotional, sexual, and quality of life concerns of women undergoing radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for treatment of early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jeanne Carter; Yukio Sonoda; Raymond E Baser; Leigh Raviv; Dennis S Chi; Richard R Barakat; Alexia Iasonos; Carol L Brown; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A comparison of laparotomy and minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Marcelo A Vieira; Gabriel J Rendón; Mark Munsell; Lina Echeverri; Michael Frumovitz; Kathleen M Schmeler; Rene Pareja; Pedro F Escobar; Ricardo Dos Reis; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Assessing symptom distress in cancer patients: the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory.

Authors:  C S Cleeland; T R Mendoza; X S Wang; C Chou; M T Harle; M Morrissey; M C Engstrom
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Quality of life outcomes from a randomized phase III trial of cisplatin with or without topotecan in advanced carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  Bradley J Monk; Helen Q Huang; David Cella; Harry J Long
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-05-23       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Management of low-risk early-stage cervical cancer: should conization, simple trachelectomy, or simple hysterectomy replace radical surgery as the new standard of care?

Authors:  Pedro T Ramirez; Rene Pareja; Gabriel J Rendón; Carlos Millan; Michael Frumovitz; Kathleen M Schmeler
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Health-related quality of life in cervical cancer survivors: a population-based survey.

Authors:  Ida J Korfage; Marie-Louise Essink-Bot; Floortje Mols; Lonneke van de Poll-Franse; Roy Kruitwagen; Marjolein van Ballegooijen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for stage Ib1 cervical cancer.

Authors:  Chyi-Long Lee; Kuan-Gen Huang; Chin-Jung Wang; Chih-Feng Yen; Chyong-Huey Lai
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  2003-02

Review 9.  Surgical, oncological, and obstetrical outcomes after abdominal radical trachelectomy - a systematic literature review.

Authors:  René Pareja; Gabriel J Rendón; Carlos Millán Sanz-Lomana; Otto Monzón; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Oncologic outcome of fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  John P Diaz; Yukio Sonoda; Mario M Leitao; Oliver Zivanovic; Carol L Brown; Dennis S Chi; Richard R Barakat; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 5.482

View more
  4 in total

1.  A systematic review of the impact of contemporary treatment modalities for cervical cancer on women's self-reported health-related quality of life.

Authors:  L M Wiltink; M King; F Müller; M S Sousa; M Tang; A Pendlebury; J Pittman; N Roberts; L Mileshkin; R Mercieca-Bebber; M-A Tait; R Campbell; C Rutherford
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Abdominal radical trachelectomy as fertility-sparing management for early stages of cervical cancer: Our experience in 18 cases.

Authors:  Szilard Leo Kiss; Anas Fandi; Alexandra Lavinia Cozlea; Mihai Gheorghe; Mihai Stanca; Nicolae Bacalbașa; Andreea Anamaria Moldovan; Mihai Emil Căpîlna
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 3.  Sexual Dysfunction in Cervical Cancer Survivors: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Neha Mishra; Nilanchali Singh; Mohini Sachdeva; Prafull Ghatage
Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)       Date:  2021-12-07

4.  Symptom Clusters and Quality of Life in Cervical Cancer Patients Receiving Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: The Mediating Role of Illness Perceptions.

Authors:  Lan Zhang; Jia Wang; Tangzhen Chen; Min Tian; Qimin Zhou; Jianhua Ren
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 4.157

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.