Literature DB >> 18661501

Defining the face processing network: optimization of the functional localizer in fMRI.

Christopher J Fox1, Giuseppe Iaria, Jason J S Barton.   

Abstract

Functional localizers that contrast brain signal when viewing faces versus objects are commonly used in functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of face processing. However, current protocols do not reliably show all regions of the core system for face processing in all subjects when conservative statistical thresholds are used, which is problematic in the study of single subjects. Furthermore, arbitrary variations in the applied thresholds are associated with inconsistent estimates of the size of face-selective regions-of-interest (ROIs). We hypothesized that the use of more natural dynamic facial images in localizers might increase the likelihood of identifying face-selective ROIs in individual subjects, and we also investigated the use of a method to derive the statistically optimal ROI cluster size independent of thresholds. We found that dynamic facial stimuli were more effective than static stimuli, identifying 98% (versus 72% for static) of ROIs in the core face processing system and 69% (versus 39% for static) of ROIs in the extended face processing system. We then determined for each core face processing ROI, the cluster size associated with maximum statistical face-selectivity, which on average was approximately 50 mm(3) for the fusiform face area, the occipital face area, and the posterior superior temporal sulcus. We suggest that the combination of (a) more robust face-related activity induced by a dynamic face localizer and (b) a cluster-size determination based on maximum face-selectivity increases both the sensitivity and the specificity of the characterization of face-related ROIs in individual subjects. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18661501      PMCID: PMC6870735          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  58 in total

Review 1.  Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion.

Authors:  Aina Puce; David Perrett
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Enhanced neural activity in response to dynamic facial expressions of emotion: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Wataru Sato; Takanori Kochiyama; Sakiko Yoshikawa; Eiichi Naito; Michikazu Matsumura
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-06

3.  fMRI-adaptation reveals dissociable neural representations of identity and expression in face perception.

Authors:  J S Winston; R N A Henson; M R Fine-Goulden; R J Dolan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  A post-processing/region of interest (ROI) method for discriminating patterns of activity in statistical maps of fMRI data.

Authors:  Martin J McKeown; Colleen A Hanlon
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2004-05-30       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe.

Authors:  Timothy J Andrews; Michael P Ewbank
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Functional anatomy of biological motion perception in posterior temporal cortex: an FMRI study of eye, mouth and hand movements.

Authors:  Kevin A Pelphrey; James P Morris; Charles R Michelich; Truett Allison; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Cortical systems for the recognition of emotion in facial expressions.

Authors:  R Adolphs; H Damasio; D Tranel; A R Damasio
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Recovery from adaptation to facial identity is larger for upright than inverted faces in the human occipito-temporal cortex.

Authors:  Angelique Mazard; Christine Schiltz; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-10-17       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 9.  Disorders of face perception and recognition.

Authors:  Jason J Barton
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.806

10.  A network of occipito-temporal face-sensitive areas besides the right middle fusiform gyrus is necessary for normal face processing.

Authors:  Bruno Rossion; Roberto Caldara; Mohamed Seghier; Anne-Marie Schuller; Francois Lazeyras; Eugene Mayer
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  104 in total

Review 1.  Connectivity-based parcellation: Critique and implications.

Authors:  Simon B Eickhoff; Bertrand Thirion; Gaël Varoquaux; Danilo Bzdok
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-09-27       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Getting lost: Topographic skills in acquired and developmental prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Corrow; Sherryse L Corrow; Edison Lee; Raika Pancaroglu; Ford Burles; Brad Duchaine; Giuseppe Iaria; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Word inversion sensitivity as a marker of visual word form area lateralization: An application of a novel multivariate measure of laterality.

Authors:  Brandon J Carlos; Elizabeth A Hirshorn; Corrine Durisko; Julie A Fiez; Marc N Coutanche
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Neural portraits of perception: reconstructing face images from evoked brain activity.

Authors:  Alan S Cowen; Marvin M Chun; Brice A Kuhl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Fusiform Gyrus Laterality in Writing Systems with Different Mapping Principles: An Artificial Orthography Training Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Hirshorn; Alaina Wrencher; Corrine Durisko; Michelle W Moore; Julie A Fiez
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Multi-voxel pattern analysis of selective representation of visual working memory in ventral temporal and occipital regions.

Authors:  Xufeng Han; Alexander C Berg; Hwamee Oh; Dimitris Samaras; Hoi-Chung Leung
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Linking signal detection theory and encoding models to reveal independent neural representations from neuroimaging data.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Lauren E Vucovich; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Spatial Mechanisms within the Dorsal Visual Pathway Contribute to the Configural Processing of Faces.

Authors:  Valentinos Zachariou; Christine V Nikas; Zaid N Safiullah; Stephen J Gotts; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  A continuous semantic space describes the representation of thousands of object and action categories across the human brain.

Authors:  Alexander G Huth; Shinji Nishimoto; An T Vu; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Cerebral asymmetries: complementary and independent processes.

Authors:  Gjurgjica Badzakova-Trajkov; Isabelle S Häberling; Reece P Roberts; Michael C Corballis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.