Literature DB >> 16229867

Recovery from adaptation to facial identity is larger for upright than inverted faces in the human occipito-temporal cortex.

Angelique Mazard1, Christine Schiltz, Bruno Rossion.   

Abstract

Human faces look more similar to each other when they are presented upside-down, leading to an increase of error rates and response times during individual face discrimination tasks. Here we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to test the hypothesis that this perceived similarity leads to a lower recovery from identity adaptation for inverted faces than for upright faces in face-sensitive areas of the occipito-temporal cortex. Ten subjects were presented with blocks of upright and inverted faces, with the same face identity repeated consecutively in half of the blocks, and different facial identities repeated in the other blocks. When face stimuli were presented upright, the percent signal change in the bilateral middle fusiform gyrus (MFG) was larger for different faces as compared to same faces, replicating previous observations of a recovery from facial identity adaptation in this region. However, there was no significant recovery from adaptation when different inverted faces were presented. Most interestingly, the difference in activation between upright and inverted faces increased progressively during a block when different facial identities were presented. A similar pattern of activation was found in the left middle fusiform gyrus, but was less clear-cut in bilateral face-sensitive areas of the inferior occipital cortex. These findings show that the differential level of activation to upright and inverted faces in the fusiform gyrus is mainly due to a difference in recovery from adaptation, and they explain the discrepancies in the results reported in previous fMRI studies which compared the processing of upright and inverted faces. The lack of recovery from adaptation for inverted faces in the fusiform gyrus may underlie the face inversion effect (FIE), which takes place during perceptual encoding of individual face representations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16229867     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  23 in total

1.  fMRI-adaptation and category selectivity in human ventral temporal cortex: regional differences across time scales.

Authors:  Kevin S Weiner; Rory Sayres; Joakim Vinberg; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces.

Authors:  Nancy Kanwisher; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Defining the face processing network: optimization of the functional localizer in fMRI.

Authors:  Christopher J Fox; Giuseppe Iaria; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Event-related potential and functional MRI measures of face-selectivity are highly correlated: a simultaneous ERP-fMRI investigation.

Authors:  Boaz Sadeh; Ilana Podlipsky; Andrey Zhdanov; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  The effect of face inversion for neurons inside and outside fMRI-defined face-selective cortical regions.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Goedele Van Belle; Wim Vanduffel; Bruno Rossion; Rufin Vogels
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Stimulus Dependent Dynamic Reorganization of the Human Face Processing Network.

Authors:  Gideon Rosenthal; Olaf Sporns; Galia Avidan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Being BOLD: The neural dynamics of face perception.

Authors:  Francesco Gentile; Justin Ales; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  "What" precedes "which": developmental neural tuning in face- and place-related cortex.

Authors:  K Suzanne Scherf; Beatriz Luna; Galia Avidan; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Face-identity change activation outside the face system: "release from adaptation" may not always indicate neuronal selectivity.

Authors:  Marieke Mur; Douglas A Ruff; Jerzy Bodurka; Peter A Bandettini; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  The Thatcher illusion reveals orientation dependence in brain regions involved in processing facial expressions.

Authors:  Lilia Psalta; Andrew W Young; Peter Thompson; Timothy J Andrews
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-11-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.