Literature DB >> 18657276

Flexion reminder device to discourage recurrent posterior dislocation of a total hip replacement: a case report.

King Wong1, Manoj Sivan, Gordon Matthews.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Recurrent dislocation of a total hip replacement prosthesis is a frustrating complication for both the surgeon and the patient. For positional dislocations with no indications for revision surgery, the current best treatment is physiotherapy, the use of abduction braces and avoidance of unsafe hip positions. Abduction braces can be cumbersome and have poor compliance. We report the successful use of a new lightweight flexion reminder device that can be used to treat people with this condition. CASE
PRESENTATION: A 64-year-old British woman experienced recurrent positional posterior dislocation after primary hip replacement, particularly when involved in activities involving unsafe flexion of the operated hip. She disliked using an abduction brace and hence was given a simple 'flexion reminder device' that could be strapped to the thigh. Beyond the safe flexion limit, the padded top end of the device hitched against the groin crease and reminded her not to flex further, to avoid dislocation. She experienced no discomfort in wearing the device continuously throughout the day and was very satisfied. She has had no further dislocations in the 2 years since she began using it.
CONCLUSION: In cases of arthroplasty dislocation caused mainly by an unsafe hip position, and with no indication for revision surgery, this new lightweight and easily worn flexion reminder device may be a good option for avoiding such positional dislocations, particularly those caused by unsafe flexion.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 18657276      PMCID: PMC2503994          DOI: 10.1186/1752-1947-2-250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Case Rep        ISSN: 1752-1947


  8 in total

1.  The use of a constrained acetabular component for recurrent dislocation.

Authors:  Gary S Shapiro; Daniel E Weiland; David C Markel; Douglas E Padgett; Thomas P Sculco; Paul M Pellicci
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  The use of a constrained acetabular component to treat instability after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  M Wade Shrader; Javad Parvizi; David G Lewallen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Recurrent instability after total hip arthroplasty: beware of subtle component malpositioning.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Kang-Il Kim; Grigory Goldberg; Gregory Mallo; William J Hozack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Epidemiology of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R M D Meek; D B Allan; G McPhillips; L Kerr; C R Howie
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Classification and treatment of dislocations of total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  L D Dorr; A W Wolf; R Chandler; J P Conaty
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Efficacy of abduction bracing in the management of total hip arthroplasty dislocation.

Authors:  Hargovind Dewal; Stephen L Maurer; Peter Tsai; Edward Su; Rudi Hiebert; Paul E Di Cesare
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Y Woo; B F Morrey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  The cumulative long-term risk of dislocation after primary Charnley total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel J Berry; Marius von Knoch; Cathy D Schleck; W Scott Harmsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.284

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.