Literature DB >> 16672895

Recurrent instability after total hip arthroplasty: beware of subtle component malpositioning.

Javad Parvizi1, Kang-Il Kim, Grigory Goldberg, Gregory Mallo, William J Hozack.   

Abstract

Most patients exhibiting instability after total hip arthroplasty can be treated nonoperatively. However, instability may become recurrent and require surgical intervention. Abductor insufficiency and component malpositioning constitute two of the most important causes of recurrent instability, although the exact cause may not be identifiable in some patients. There is relative scarcity of reports in the literature regarding the outcome of surgical intervention for recurrent instability; however, it is known that surgical intervention is likely to have a better outcome in patients for whom the cause of recurrent instability can be identified. We hypothesized that component malpositioning, which may be subtle in some cases, is the cause of recurrent instability for many patients. The outcomes of revision arthroplasty in 93 patients who were treated at our institution for recurrent instability were reviewed. Component malpositioning was found to be the major cause of recurrent instability in this successfully treated cohort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16672895     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000218749.37860.7c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  10 in total

1.  Instability after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brian C Werner; Thomas E Brown
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2012-08-18

2.  Late dislocation is associated with recurrence after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takashi Itokawa; Yasuharu Nakashima; Takuaki Yamamoto; Goro Motomura; Masanobu Ohishi; Satoshi Hamai; Mio Akiyama; Masanobu Hirata; Daisuke Hara; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Does dual-mobility cup geometry affect posterior horizontal dislocation distance?

Authors:  Christopher Heffernan; Samik Banerjee; Jim Nevelos; James Macintyre; Kimona Issa; David C Markel; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Soft tissue tension is four times lower in the unstable primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takeshi Ogawa; Masaki Takao; Hidetoshi Hamada; Takashi Sakai; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Total hip arthroplasty instability in Italy.

Authors:  Francesco Falez; Matteo Papalia; Fabio Favetti; Gabriele Panegrossi; Filippo Casella; Gianluca Mazzotta
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Computer-Assisted Navigation for Complex Revision of Unstable Total Hip Replacement in a Patient With Post-traumatic Arthritis.

Authors:  Kelsey A Rankin; Logan Petit; Adam Nasreddine; Phil Minotti; Michael Leslie; Daniel H Wiznia
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-05-10

7.  The unstable total hip replacement.

Authors:  F D'Angelo; L Murena; G Zatti; P Cherubino
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Flexion reminder device to discourage recurrent posterior dislocation of a total hip replacement: a case report.

Authors:  King Wong; Manoj Sivan; Gordon Matthews
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2008-07-25

9.  Range of Movement for Impingement and Dislocation Avoidance in Total Hip Replacement Predicted by Finite Element Model.

Authors:  Laura Ezquerra; María Paz Quilez; María Ángeles Pérez; Jorge Albareda; Belén Seral
Journal:  J Med Biol Eng       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 1.553

10.  A Geometric Model to Determine Patient-Specific Cup Anteversion Based on Pelvic Motion in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  E Grant Sutter; Samuel S Wellman; Michael P Bolognesi; Thorsten M Seyler
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2019-05-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.